• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环孢素联合依维莫司与霉酚酸酯治疗心脏移植受者:SHIRAKISS 随机前瞻性研究的长期随访。

Cyclosporine lowering with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients: long-term follow-up of the SHIRAKISS randomized, prospective study.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Department, University of Bologna, Academic Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, via Massarenti 9, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Jun;31(6):565-70. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2012.01.002
PMID:22341702
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine nephrotoxicity negatively impacts long-term outcome after heart transplantation (HT). We previously reported 1-year results from a randomized study showing that cyclosporine-lowering strategies based on everolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are equally effective for reducing progression of renal dysfunction. It is unknown whether this efficacy could be maintained over the long term.

METHODS

Thirty-four recipients 1 to 4 years after HT and with 25 to 60 ml/min of creatinine clearance (CrCl) were randomized to everolimus with a very low dose (C(0): 50 to 90 ng/ml, n = 17) or MMF with low dose of cyclosporine (C(0): 100 to 150 ng/ml, n = 17). Follow-up was prolonged up to 3 years, and calculated CrCl was the main efficacy measure.

RESULTS

Cyclosporine was maintained at 70% and 30% lower than baseline in the everolimus and MMF arms, respectively, throughout the 3-year study period. CrCl remained stable in the everolimus patients (+7% from baseline; p = 0.7), but improved in the MMF patients (+20% from baseline; p < 0.01), with a trend toward improved values compared with everolimus patients (46 ± 12 vs 56 ± 15 ml/min; p = 0.06). Subgroup analysis revealed that baseline proteinuria markedly influenced the renal function response to everolimus: whereas in patients with baseline proteinuria CrCl significantly worsened (-20%; p = 0.04), it improved in those without (+15%; p = 0.03). Safety was comparable between the two study arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclosporine nephrotoxicity improved after a prolonged dose reduction in patients receiving MMF. The everolimus-based strategy provided a similar benefit only to patients without baseline proteinuria. While raising caution against the universal use of everolimus for kidney protection, our long-term results support the need for customized approaches in the management of drug toxicities in maintenance HT recipients.

摘要

背景

环孢素肾毒性会对心脏移植(HT)后的长期预后产生负面影响。我们之前报告了一项随机研究的 1 年结果,该研究表明,基于依维莫司或吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)的环孢素降阶策略在降低肾功能障碍进展方面同样有效。目前尚不清楚这种疗效是否能长期维持。

方法

34 例 HT 后 1 至 4 年、肌酐清除率(CrCl)为 25 至 60 ml/min 的受者被随机分为依维莫司低剂量组(C(0):50 至 90ng/ml,n=17)或 MMF 低剂量环孢素组(C(0):100 至 150ng/ml,n=17)。随访时间延长至 3 年,计算的 CrCl 是主要疗效指标。

结果

在整个 3 年研究期间,依维莫司组和 MMF 组的环孢素分别维持在基线水平的 70%和 30%以下。依维莫司组的 CrCl 保持稳定(与基线相比增加 7%;p=0.7),而 MMF 组则有所改善(与基线相比增加 20%;p<0.01),与依维莫司组相比有改善的趋势(46±12 与 56±15ml/min;p=0.06)。亚组分析显示,基线蛋白尿显著影响依维莫司的肾功能反应:基线蛋白尿患者的 CrCl 显著恶化(-20%;p=0.04),而无蛋白尿患者则改善(+15%;p=0.03)。两组研究之间的安全性相当。

结论

在接受 MMF 的患者中,长时间减少环孢素剂量后,环孢素肾毒性得到改善。依维莫司为基础的策略仅对无基线蛋白尿的患者提供了类似的益处。虽然对普遍使用依维莫司进行肾脏保护持谨慎态度,但我们的长期结果支持在维持性 HT 受者药物毒性管理中采用个体化方法的必要性。

相似文献

1
Cyclosporine lowering with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients: long-term follow-up of the SHIRAKISS randomized, prospective study.环孢素联合依维莫司与霉酚酸酯治疗心脏移植受者:SHIRAKISS 随机前瞻性研究的长期随访。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Jun;31(6):565-70. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
2
Everolimus with reduced cyclosporine versus MMF with standard cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients.在初发心脏移植受者中,使用减量环孢素的依维莫司与使用标准环孢素的霉酚酸酯对比研究。
Transplantation. 2009 Jul 15;88(1):115-22. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181aacd22.
3
A 1-year randomized controlled study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil with reduced-dose cyclosporine in maintenance heart transplant recipients.一项针对心脏移植受者维持治疗中,依维莫司与霉酚酸酯联合小剂量环孢素对比的1年随机对照研究。
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jul-Aug;45(6):2387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.03.032.
4
Observational study with everolimus (Certican) in combination with low-dose cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients.依维莫司(Certican)联合低剂量环孢素用于初发心脏移植受者的观察性研究。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Jul;26(7):700-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.02.008. Epub 2007 Apr 6.
5
Lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo cardiac transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter study.与霉酚酸酯相比,依维莫司在心脏移植初治受者中巨细胞病毒感染发生率更低:一项随机、多中心研究。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2010 Feb;12(1):23-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2009.00448.x. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
6
Heart transplantation under cyclosporine or tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil or everolimus.在环孢素或他克莫司联合霉酚酸酯或依维莫司的情况下进行心脏移植。
Transplant Proc. 2008 Oct;40(8):2607-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.08.072.
7
Cyclosporine lowering with everolimus or mycophenolate to preserve renal function in heart recipients: a randomized study.在心脏移植受者中使用依维莫司或霉酚酸降低环孢素剂量以保护肾功能:一项随机研究。
Transplantation. 2010 Jan 27;89(2):263-5. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181c42b95.
8
Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in the prevention of rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients: a 3-year randomized, multicenter, phase III study.依维莫司与霉酚酸酯预防初发肾移植受者排斥反应的比较:一项为期3年的随机、多中心、III期研究。
Transplantation. 2005 Jul 27;80(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000164352.65613.24.
9
Everolimus with reduced-dose cyclosporine versus full-dose cyclosporine and mycophenolate in de novo renal transplant patients: a 2-year single-center experience.依维莫司联合低剂量环孢素与全剂量环孢素及霉酚酸酯用于初发肾移植患者的疗效比较:一项为期2年的单中心研究经验
Transplant Proc. 2012 Jan;44(1):154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.11.055.
10
The survival of heart transplant recipients using cyclosporine and everolimus is not inferior to that using cyclosporine and mycophenolate.使用环孢素和依维莫司的心脏移植受者的生存率不低于使用环孢素和霉酚酸酯的受者。
Transplant Proc. 2010 Apr;42(3):938-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.03.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Electrical storm due to Epstein-Barr virus-induced lymphoma of a transplanted heart: a case report.因爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒诱导的移植心脏淋巴瘤引发的电风暴:一例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2022 Jun 13;6(6):ytac212. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac212. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Novel Immunosuppression in Solid Organ Transplantation.实体器官移植中的新型免疫抑制。
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2022;272:267-285. doi: 10.1007/164_2021_569.
3
Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant.心脏移植后第一年他克莫司与环孢素A对肾功能的影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;7(4):1842-1849. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12749. Epub 2020 May 23.
4
Early Everolimus Initiation Fails to Counteract the Cytotoxic Response Mediated by CD8 T and NK Cells in Heart Transplant Patients.早期依维莫司给药未能抵消心脏移植患者 CD8 T 细胞和 NK 细胞介导的细胞毒性反应。
Front Immunol. 2018 Sep 26;9:2181. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02181. eCollection 2018.
5
Evaluation of a Heart Transplant Candidate.心脏移植候选人评估。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Nov 4;19(12):133. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0934-y.
6
Renal function in heart transplant patients after switch to combined mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and calcineurin inhibitor therapy.转换为雷帕霉素哺乳动物靶点抑制剂与钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂联合治疗后心脏移植患者的肾功能
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 Jun 7;11:1673-1680. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S135503. eCollection 2017.
7
The CECARI Study: Everolimus (Certican®) Initiation and Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal in Maintenance Heart Transplant Recipients with Renal Insufficiency: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.CECARI研究:肾移植功能不全的心脏移植受者维持期使用依维莫司(Certican®)起始治疗及停用钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂:一项多中心随机试验
J Transplant. 2017;2017:6347138. doi: 10.1155/2017/6347138. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
8
Twelve-month efficacy and safety of the conversion to everolimus in maintenance heart transplant recipients.心脏移植受者维持治疗转换为依维莫司的12个月疗效与安全性
World J Transplant. 2015 Dec 24;5(4):310-9. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i4.310.
9
Chronic renal insufficiency in heart transplant recipients: risk factors and management options.心脏移植受者的慢性肾功能不全:危险因素和治疗选择。
Drugs. 2014 Sep;74(13):1481-94. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0274-9.
10
Everolimus in heart transplantation: an update.依维莫司在心脏移植中的应用:最新进展
J Transplant. 2013;2013:683964. doi: 10.1155/2013/683964. Epub 2013 Dec 5.