Virginia Tech - Wake Forest University, School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Center for Injury Biomechanics, 325 Stanger St. (MC 0194), Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Jul;47:128-39. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.01.016. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
A total of 34 dynamic matched frontal sled tests were performed, 17 low (2.5g, Δv=4.8kph) and 17 medium (5.0g, Δv=9.7kph), with five male human volunteers of approximately 50th percentile height and weight, a Hybrid III 50th percentile male ATD, and three male PMHS. Each volunteer was exposed to two impulses at each severity, one relaxed and one braced prior to the impulse. A total of four tests were performed at each severity with the ATD and one trial was performed at each severity with each PMHS. A Vicon motion analysis system, 12 MX-T20 2 megapixel cameras, was used to quantify subject 3D kinematics (±1mm) (1kHz). Excursions of select anatomical regions were normalized to their respective initial positions and compared by test condition and between subject types. The forward excursions of the select anatomical regions generally increased with increasing severity. The forward excursions of relaxed human volunteers were significantly larger than those of the ATD for nearly every region at both severities. The forward excursions of the upper body regions of the braced volunteers were generally significantly smaller than those of the ATD at both severities. Forward excursions of the relaxed human volunteers and PMHSs were fairly similar except the head CG response at both severities and the right knee and C7 at the medium severity. The forward excursions of the upper body of the PMHS were generally significantly larger than those of the braced volunteers at both severities. Forward excursions of the PMHSs exceeded those of the ATD for all regions at both severities with significant differences within the upper body regions. Overall human volunteers, ATD, and PMHSs do not have identical biomechanical responses in low-speed frontal sled tests but all contribute valuable data that can be used to refine and validate computational models and ATDs used to assess injury risk in automotive collisions.
总共进行了 34 次动态匹配的正面滑橇测试,其中 17 次为低强度(2.5g,Δv=4.8kph),17 次为中强度(5.0g,Δv=9.7kph),参与者为 5 名男性志愿者,他们的身高和体重约为第 50 百分位,一个 Hybrid III 第 50 百分位男性 ATD,以及 3 名男性 PMHS。每个志愿者在每种强度下各接受两次冲击,一次放松,一次支撑,然后再接受冲击。每种强度下 ATD 进行了 4 次测试,每个强度下 PMHS 进行了 1 次测试。使用 Vicon 运动分析系统、12 个 MX-T20 200 万像素相机来量化受试者的 3D 运动学(±1mm)(1kHz)。选择的解剖区域的位移被归一化为各自的初始位置,并根据测试条件和受试者类型进行比较。选择的解剖区域的向前位移通常随着强度的增加而增加。在两种强度下,放松的人类志愿者的向前位移比 ATD 大得多,几乎在每个区域都是如此。支撑志愿者的上身区域的向前位移在两种强度下通常都明显小于 ATD。放松的人类志愿者和 PMHS 的向前位移相当相似,除了两种强度下头部 CG 响应以及中等强度下的右膝和 C7。PMHS 上半身的向前位移通常明显大于支撑志愿者在两种强度下的向前位移。PMHS 的向前位移在两种强度下都大于 ATD,在身体上部区域有显著差异。总体而言,在低速正面滑橇测试中,人类志愿者、ATD 和 PMHS 的生物力学反应并不完全相同,但都提供了有价值的数据,可以用于改进和验证用于评估汽车碰撞中受伤风险的计算模型和 ATD。