Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Anesthesiology. 2012 Apr;116(4):834-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824c00d7.
Cerebral oximetry is a noninvasive technology using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to estimate regional cerebral oxygen saturation. Although NIRS cerebral oximetry is being increasingly used in many clinical settings, interdevice technologic differences suggest potential variation in the ability to accurately acquire brain oxygenation signals. The primary objective of this study was to determine if NIRS-derived regional cerebral oxygen saturation measurements accurately account for oxygen saturation contamination from extracranial tissue.
Twelve healthy volunteers had each of three NIRS devices (FORE-SIGHT [CAS Medical Systems Inc; Brandford, CT], INVOS 5100C-PB [Covidien; Boulder, CO], and EQUANOX Classic 7600 [Nonin Medical Inc; Plymouth, MN]) randomly applied to the forehead. After this, a circumferential pneumatic head cuff was positioned such that when inflated, hypoxia-ischemia would be produced in the extracranial scalp tissue beneath the NIRS cerebral oximeters. Comparisons among the three devices were made of the NIRS measurements before and following hypoxia-ischemia produced in the scalp tissue with inflation of the head cuff.
The induction of extracranial hypoxia-ischemia resulted in a significant reduction in regional cerebral oxygen saturation measurements in all three NIRS devices studied. At 5 min postinflation of the pneumatic head cuff, the INVOS demonstrated a 16.6 ± 9.6% (mean ± SD) decrease from its baseline (P = 0.0001), the FORE-SIGHT an 11.8 ± 5.3% decrease from its baseline (P < 0.0001), and the EQUANOX a 6.8 ± 6.0% reduction from baseline (P = 0.0025).
Extracranial contamination appears to significantly affect NIRS measurements of cerebral oxygen saturation. Although the clinical implications of these apparent inaccuracies require further study, they suggest that the oxygen saturation measurements provided by cerebral oximetry do not solely reflect that of the brain alone.
近红外光谱(NIRS)脑氧饱和度仪是一种利用近红外光谱技术无创监测局部脑氧饱和度的技术。尽管 NIRS 脑氧饱和度仪在许多临床环境中得到了越来越多的应用,但由于设备间的技术差异,其准确获取脑氧合信号的能力可能存在差异。本研究的主要目的是确定 NIRS 衍生的局部脑氧饱和度测量值是否能准确反映来自颅外组织的氧饱和度干扰。
将三个 NIRS 设备(CAS Medical Systems Inc 的 FORE-SIGHT[卡斯医疗系统公司;康涅狄格州布拉德福德]、Covidien 的 INVOS 5100C-PB 和 Nonin Medical Inc 的 EQUANOX Classic 7600)分别随机应用于 12 名健康志愿者的前额。然后,将一个环形气动头带置于头皮下,当头带充气时,会导致颅外头皮组织发生缺氧缺血。比较了三种设备在头带充气引起头皮组织缺氧缺血前后的 NIRS 测量值。
颅外缺氧缺血的诱导导致三种研究中的 NIRS 设备的局部脑氧饱和度测量值均显著降低。在充气后的 5 分钟,INVOS 显示与基线相比降低了 16.6%±9.6%(平均值±标准差,P=0.0001),FORE-SIGHT 与基线相比降低了 11.8%±5.3%(P<0.0001),EQUANOX 与基线相比降低了 6.8%±6.0%(P=0.0025)。
颅外污染似乎显著影响 NIRS 脑氧饱和度测量值。尽管这些明显不准确的临床意义需要进一步研究,但它们表明脑氧饱和度仪提供的氧饱和度测量值并不能完全反映大脑的情况。