Suppr超能文献

基于松散共培养的致敏检测法(LCSA)评估纺织分散染料及其某些代谢物的致敏潜力。

Assessment of the sensitizing potential of textile disperse dyes and some of their metabolites by the loose-fit coculture-based sensitization assay (LCSA).

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstr. 7, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2012 May;86(5):733-40. doi: 10.1007/s00204-012-0811-9. Epub 2012 Feb 18.

Abstract

Certain textile disperse dyes are known to cause allergic reactions of the human skin. Here, we examined 8 disperse dyes and 7 products of azo-cleavage of these dyes in an in vitro assay. We used the loose-fit coculture-based sensitization assay (LCSA) of primary human keratinocytes and of allogenic dendritic cell-related cells for combined testing of the sensitizing and irritative properties of these substances. The obtained data were compared to data generated in a modified version of the local lymph node assay by our working group. Disperse Blue 1 (DB1), p-nitroaniline (pNA) and p-aminoacetanilide (AAA) showed no sensitizing potential under our experimental conditions. Disperse Blue 124 (DB124), Disperse Yellow 3 (DY3), Disperse Orange 37/76 (DO37), Disperse Blue 106 (DB106), Disperse Red 1 (DR1), 2-amino-p-cresol (ApC), Disperse Orange 3 (DO3) and 2,6-dichloro-4-nitroaniline (DCh) were categorized as extreme sensitizers. Para-phenylenediamine (pPD) was categorized as strong sensitizer, and 2-amino-5-nitrothiazole (ANT) and 2-(N-ethylanilino)-ethanol (EAE) as weak sensitizers. All dyes, except for DB1, and ApC turned out to be strong irritants. DB1, ANT and DCh showed only weak irritative potential. PPD, pNA, EAE and AAA did not show any irritative effect at the concentration range tested. These results correlate with data derived from the modified version of LLNA and human data. Therefore, the LCSA represents a suitable test system to simultaneously analyse two crucial properties of substances relevant for allergy induction.

摘要

某些纺织分散染料已知会引起人体皮肤过敏反应。在这里,我们在体外试验中检查了 8 种分散染料和这些染料的 7 种偶氮裂解产物。我们使用基于松散共培养的致敏测定法(LCSA)对原代人角质形成细胞和同种异体树突状细胞相关细胞进行测试,以联合测试这些物质的致敏和刺激性。所得数据与我们工作组在改良局部淋巴结测定法中生成的数据进行了比较。在我们的实验条件下,分散蓝 1(DB1)、对硝基苯胺(pNA)和对氨基乙酰苯胺(AAA)没有表现出致敏潜力。分散蓝 124(DB124)、分散黄 3(DY3)、分散橙 37/76(DO37)、分散蓝 106(DB106)、分散红 1(DR1)、2-氨基对甲酚(ApC)、分散橙 3(DO3)和 2,6-二氯-4-硝基苯胺(DCh)被归类为极端致敏剂。对苯二胺(pPD)被归类为强致敏剂,2-氨基-5-硝基噻唑(ANT)和 2-(N-乙基苯胺基)-乙醇(EAE)被归类为弱致敏剂。除了 DB1 和 ApC 之外,所有染料均表现出强烈的刺激性。DB1、ANT 和 DCh 仅表现出较弱的刺激性。PPD、pNA、EAE 和 AAA 在测试浓度范围内均未显示出任何刺激性作用。这些结果与从改良版 LLNA 和人体数据中得出的数据相关。因此,LCSA 代表了一种合适的测试系统,可同时分析与过敏诱导相关的两种关键物质特性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验