Genetics Institute, 87 Cambridge Park Dr., 02140, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Cytotechnology. 1995 Jan;18(1-2):9-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00744314.
In the 1950s, only primary cell cultures were acceptable for the production of human biological products. This position was challenged in the late 1960s by human diploid cells (HDCs), and again in the 1980s by continuous cell lines (CCLs). The history of the HDC controversy is reviewed and lessons from that era that are relevant to the use of CCLs are pointed out. It became apparent in the early days of recombinant DNA technology in the 1980s that CCLs were needed for the development of some products. CCL acceptability therefore became more urgent, and several attempts were made to reach a consensus on regulatory issues. In 1986, the World Health Organization convened a Study Group to review the safety issues related to products derived from CCLs. The Study Group made a clear recommendation to pursue CCLs in product development because of the demonstrated capability of modern manufacturing processes to cope with contaminants. Issues such as acceptable levels of cellular DNA in products and the relationship of purity to safety are discussed in the context of the need for regulatory authorities, industry, and the general biomedical community to cooperate in addressing problems in a rational scientific manner.
在 20 世纪 50 年代,只有原代细胞培养物可用于生产人体生物制品。这一立场在 20 世纪 60 年代末期受到人类二倍体细胞(HDC)的挑战,在 20 世纪 80 年代又受到连续细胞系(CCL)的挑战。本文回顾了 HDC 争议的历史,并指出了与 CCL 应用相关的那个时代的经验教训。在 20 世纪 80 年代重组 DNA 技术的早期,人们明显认识到需要 CCL 来开发某些产品。因此,CCL 的可接受性变得更加紧迫,并且为了在监管问题上达成共识,进行了几次尝试。1986 年,世界卫生组织召集了一个研究小组来审查与 CCL 衍生产品相关的安全问题。该研究小组明确建议在产品开发中使用 CCL,因为现代制造工艺有能力应对污染物。本文在讨论监管机构、工业界和一般生物医学界需要以合理的科学方式合作解决问题时,还讨论了产品中细胞 DNA 可接受水平以及纯度与安全性之间的关系等问题。