Sports Medicine and Arthroscopic Shoulder & Knee Surgery, Pinnacle Health Sciences Center, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada.
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Sep;26(9):e132-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318238b22b.
Intramedullary reaming of long bones before nail insertion has been known to cause an increase in fat emboli introduction into the bloodstream, which is a potentially fatal phenomenon. The goal of this study was to assess whether the reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) reamer can reduce fat embolic load compared with the standard AO reamer.
Fifteen pigs were prepared using an intravenous catheter inserted into the marginal ear vein for fluid balance and drug administration. One third of the pig's blood volume was withdrawn to simulate hemorrhagic shock. Each animal underwent bilateral retrograde femoral reaming, cementing, and nailing using either an RIA or AO reamer. Assignment of a reamer type to the left or right side was done randomly and allowed for direct comparison of matching femur results. Outcome measures were obtained, namely, pulmonary arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, partial pressure of arterial oxygen, and cardiac output. Staining techniques were used to ascertain fat emboli counts from lung tissue samples.
For mean arterial pressure, partial pressure of arterial oxygen, and cardiac output after cement injection, the RIA reamer group showed statistically higher values than the AO reamer group. In corollary, the RIA showed statistically lower pulmonary arterial pressure levels. No differences were noted at baseline, during hypovolemia, and post resuscitation. With the Student t test, no statistical differences were found between reamers regarding fat emboli counts for both staining methods. With the Mann-Whitney test, the RIA reamer showed statistically fewer emboli (7.0 versus 74.5) (P = 0.02, Z = 2.33) using Oil Red "O" staining.
The RIA reamer demonstrated superior results with respect to physiologic measures and fat emboli counts and may provide optimal results compared with the AO reamer.
髓内扩孔在插入钉子之前已经被认为会增加脂肪栓子进入血流的风险,这是一种潜在致命的现象。本研究的目的是评估与标准的 AO 扩孔器相比,RIA 扩孔器是否可以减少脂肪栓塞负荷。
15 头猪通过插入边缘耳静脉的静脉导管来准备,用于液体平衡和药物管理。抽出猪的三分之一血液量以模拟失血性休克。每只动物都进行双侧逆行股骨髓内扩孔、骨水泥固定和钉棒固定,使用 RIA 或 AO 扩孔器。扩孔器类型分配到左侧或右侧是随机的,允许对匹配的股骨结果进行直接比较。测量的结果是肺动脉压、平均动脉压、动脉血氧分压和心输出量。使用染色技术确定肺组织样本中的脂肪栓塞计数。
在骨水泥注射后的平均动脉压、动脉血氧分压和心输出量方面,RIA 扩孔器组显示出统计学上更高的值,而在肺动脉压方面则显示出统计学上更低的值。在基础值、低血容量期间和复苏后没有差异。通过 Student t 检验,两种染色方法的脂肪栓塞计数在两种扩孔器之间没有统计学差异。通过 Mann-Whitney 检验,RIA 扩孔器的脂肪栓塞数量明显更少(7.0 与 74.5)(P = 0.02,Z = 2.33),使用油红“O”染色。
与 AO 扩孔器相比,RIA 扩孔器在生理测量和脂肪栓塞计数方面表现出更好的结果,可能提供更优的结果。