Suppr超能文献

背景选择在塑造分子进化和变异模式中的作用:来自果蝇 X 染色体变异性的证据。

The role of background selection in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation: evidence from variability on the Drosophila X chromosome.

机构信息

Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Genetics. 2012 May;191(1):233-46. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.138073. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

Abstract

In the putatively ancestral population of Drosophila melanogaster, the ratio of silent DNA sequence diversity for X-linked loci to that for autosomal loci is approximately one, instead of the expected "null" value of 3/4. One possible explanation is that background selection (the hitchhiking effect of deleterious mutations) is more effective on the autosomes than on the X chromosome, because of the lack of crossing over in male Drosophila. The expected effects of background selection on neutral variability at sites in the middle of an X chromosome or an autosomal arm were calculated for different models of chromosome organization and methods of approximation, using current estimates of the deleterious mutation rate and distributions of the fitness effects of deleterious mutations. The robustness of the results to different distributions of fitness effects, dominance coefficients, mutation rates, mapping functions, and chromosome size was investigated. The predicted ratio of X-linked to autosomal variability is relatively insensitive to these variables, except for the mutation rate and map length. Provided that the deleterious mutation rate per genome is sufficiently large, it seems likely that background selection can account for the observed X to autosome ratio of variability in the ancestral population of D. melanogaster. The fact that this ratio is much less than one in D. pseudoobscura is also consistent with the model's predictions, since this species has a high rate of crossing over. The results suggest that background selection may play a major role in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation.

摘要

在假定的黑腹果蝇祖先种群中,X 连锁基因座的沉默 DNA 序列多样性与常染色体基因座的比例约为 1,而不是预期的 3/4 的“零值”。一种可能的解释是,由于雄性果蝇中缺乏交叉,背景选择(有害突变的搭便车效应)对常染色体的影响比对 X 染色体更大。使用当前对有害突变率和有害突变的适合度效应分布的估计,针对不同的染色体组织模型和逼近方法,计算了背景选择对 X 染色体或常染色体臂中间位点中性变异性的预期影响。还研究了不同的适合度效应分布、显性系数、突变率、映射函数和染色体大小对结果的稳健性。预测的 X 连锁与常染色体变异性的比例除了突变率和图谱长度外,对这些变量相对不敏感。只要每个基因组的有害突变率足够大,背景选择似乎可以解释黑腹果蝇祖先种群中观察到的 X 染色体与常染色体变异性的比例。事实上,这个比例在 D. pseudoobscura 中远远小于 1,这也与模型的预测一致,因为这个物种的交叉率很高。结果表明,背景选择可能在塑造分子进化和变异模式方面发挥重要作用。

相似文献

2
The relation between recombination rate and patterns of molecular evolution and variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Apr;31(4):1010-28. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu056. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
3
Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome versus the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):811-23. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss222. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
4
Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.
Genet Res. 1996 Oct;68(2):131-49. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300034029.
6
Background selection as baseline for nucleotide variation across the Drosophila genome.
PLoS Genet. 2014 Jun 26;10(6):e1004434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004434. eCollection 2014 Jun.
8
Fine-scale mapping of recombination rate in Drosophila refines its correlation to diversity and divergence.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 22;105(29):10051-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801848105. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
9
Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.
Genome Res. 2007 Dec;17(12):1755-62. doi: 10.1101/gr.6691007. Epub 2007 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrasting Evolutionary Trajectories Under Paternal Genome Elimination in Male and Female Citrus Mealybugs.
Mol Ecol. 2025 Jul;34(13):e17826. doi: 10.1111/mec.17826. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.
Mol Biol Evol. 2024 Dec 6;41(12). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae242.
3
The evolutionary maintenance of ancient recombining sex chromosomes in the ostrich.
PLoS Genet. 2023 Jun 30;19(6):e1010801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010801. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Enrichment of Hard Sweeps on the X Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster.
Mol Biol Evol. 2023 Jan 4;40(1). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac268.
5
X chromosomes show relaxed selection and complete somatic dosage compensation across Timema stick insect species.
J Evol Biol. 2022 Dec;35(12):1734-1750. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14075. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
6
How Can We Resolve Lewontin's Paradox?
Genome Biol Evol. 2022 Jul 2;14(7). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evac096.
7
A spatially aware likelihood test to detect sweeps from haplotype distributions.
PLoS Genet. 2022 Apr 11;18(4):e1010134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010134. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Shared evolutionary trajectories of three independent neo-sex chromosomes in .
Genome Res. 2021 Nov;31(11):2069-2079. doi: 10.1101/gr.275503.121. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
10
How Good Are Predictions of the Effects of Selective Sweeps on Levels of Neutral Diversity?
Genetics. 2020 Dec;216(4):1217-1238. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303734. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel.
Nature. 2012 Feb 8;482(7384):173-8. doi: 10.1038/nature10811.
2
The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution at linked sites.
Genetics. 2012 Jan;190(1):5-22. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.134288.
3
A population genetics-phylogenetics approach to inferring natural selection in coding sequences.
PLoS Genet. 2011 Dec;7(12):e1002395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002395. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
4
A method for inferring the rate of occurrence and fitness effects of advantageous mutations.
Genetics. 2011 Dec;189(4):1427-37. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.131730. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
5
The joint effects of background selection and genetic recombination on local gene genealogies.
Genetics. 2011 Sep;189(1):251-66. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.130575. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
6
Determinants of synonymous and nonsynonymous variability in three species of Drosophila.
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 May;28(5):1731-43. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq354. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
7
Genetic and evolutionary correlates of fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila persimilis.
J Mol Evol. 2010 Dec;71(5-6):332-45. doi: 10.1007/s00239-010-9388-1. Epub 2010 Oct 2.
8
Estimating the parameters of selection on nonsynonymous mutations in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. miranda.
Genetics. 2010 Aug;185(4):1381-96. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.117614. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
10
Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 27;365(1544):1245-53. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0278.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验