Suppr超能文献

在ROC分析背景下分层两样本检验调整方法的比较

Comparison of adjustment methods for stratified two-sample tests in the context of ROC analysis.

作者信息

Zou Kelly H, Carlsson Martin O, Yu Ching-Ray

机构信息

Pfizer Inc., New York, NY 10017, USA.

出版信息

Biom J. 2012 Mar;54(2):249-63. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201000251. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

Abstract

We compare several nonparametric and parametric weighting methods for the adjustment of the effect of strata. In particular, we focus on the adjustment methods in the context of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Nonparametrically, rank-based van Elteren's test and inverse-variance (IV) weighting using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) are examined. Parametrically, the stratified t-test and IV AUC weighted method are applied based on a binormal monotone transformation model. Stratum-specific, pooled, and adjusted estimates are obtained. The pooled and adjusted AUCs are estimated. We illustrate and compare these weighting methods on a multi-center diagnostic trial and through extensive Monte-Carlo simulations.

摘要

我们比较了几种用于调整分层效应的非参数和参数加权方法。特别地,我们关注在接受者操作特征(ROC)分析背景下的调整方法。在非参数方面,研究了基于秩的范·埃尔特伦检验以及使用ROC曲线下面积(AUC)的逆方差(IV)加权。在参数方面,基于双正态单调变换模型应用分层t检验和IV AUC加权方法。获得了特定层、合并和调整后的估计值。估计了合并和调整后的AUC。我们在一项多中心诊断试验以及通过广泛的蒙特卡罗模拟中阐述并比较了这些加权方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验