School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Qual Health Res. 2012 Jun;22(6):723-39. doi: 10.1177/1049732312438967. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
In this article we report on qualitative findings that describe public health practitioners' practice-based definitions of evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) and communities of practice (CoP), and how CoP could be a mechanism to enhance their capacity to practice EIDM. Our findings emerged from a qualitative descriptive analysis of group discussions and participant concept maps from two consensus-building workshops that were conducted with public health practitioners (N = 90) in two provinces in eastern Canada. Participants recognized the importance of EIDM and the significance of integrating explicit and tacit evidence in the EIDM process, which was enhanced by CoP. Tacit knowledge, particularly from peers and personal experience, was the preferred source of knowledge, with informal peer interactions being the favored form of CoP to support EIDM. CoP helped practitioners build relationships and community capacity, share and create knowledge, and build professional confidence and critical inquiry. Participants described individual and organizational attributes that were needed to enable CoP and EIDM.
在本文中,我们报告了定性研究结果,这些结果描述了公共卫生从业者基于实践的证据为基础的决策制定(EIDM)和实践社区(CoP)的定义,以及 CoP 如何成为增强其实践 EIDM 能力的机制。我们的研究结果来自于对加拿大东部两个省的两次共识建设研讨会的小组讨论和参与者概念图的定性描述性分析,共有 90 名公共卫生从业者参与。参与者认识到 EIDM 的重要性,以及在 EIDM 过程中整合显性和隐性证据的重要性,CoP 增强了这一过程。隐性知识,特别是来自同行和个人经验的知识,是首选的知识来源,非正式的同行互动是支持 EIDM 的首选 CoP 形式。CoP 帮助从业者建立关系和社区能力,分享和创造知识,并建立专业信心和批判性探究。参与者描述了需要 CoP 和 EIDM 的个人和组织属性。