Suppr超能文献

社会团结和对医疗保险中风险和收入相关交叉补贴的容忍意愿:来自加纳、坦桑尼亚和南非的经验。

Social solidarity and willingness to tolerate risk- and income-related cross-subsidies within health insurance: experiences from Ghana, Tanzania and South Africa.

机构信息

Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2012 Mar;27 Suppl 1:i55-63. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs008.

Abstract

The importance of ill-health in perpetuating poverty is well recognized. In order to prevent the damaging downward spiral of poverty and illness, there is a need for a greater level of social protection, with greater cross-subsidization between the poor and wealthy, and the healthy and those with ill-health. The aim of this paper is to examine individual preferences for willingness to pre-pay for health care and willingness to cross-subsidize the sick and the poor in Ghana, South Africa and Tanzania. Household surveys in the three countries elicited views on cross-subsidization within health care financing. The paper examines how these preferences varied by socio-economic status, other respondent characteristics, and the extent and type of experience of health insurance in the light of country context. In South Africa and Ghana, 62% and 55% of total respondents, respectively, were in favour of a progressive financing system in which richer groups would pay a higher proportion of income than poorer groups, rather than a system where individuals pay the same proportion of income irrespective of their wealth (proportional). In Tanzania, 45% of the total sample were willing to pay for the health care of the poor. However, in all three countries, a progressive system was favoured by a smaller proportion of the most well off than of less well off groups. Solidarity has been considered to be a collective property of a specific socio-political culture, based on shared expectations and developed as part of a communal, historical learning process. The three countries had different experiences of health insurance and this may have contributed to the above differences in expressed willingness to pay between countries. Building and 'living with' institutions that provide affordable universal coverage is likely to be an essential part of the learning process which supports the development of social solidarity.

摘要

健康不良在使贫困永久化方面的重要性是众所周知的。为了防止贫困和疾病的破坏性螺旋式下降,需要更高水平的社会保护,需要在穷人和富人之间、健康人和病人之间进行更大程度的交叉补贴。本文旨在考察加纳、南非和坦桑尼亚个人对预先支付医疗保健费用和为病人和穷人交叉补贴的意愿。这三个国家的家庭调查都对医疗保健融资中的交叉补贴问题进行了调查。本文根据国家背景,考察了这些偏好如何因社会经济地位、其他受访者特征以及医疗保险的范围和类型而有所不同。在南非和加纳,分别有 62%和 55%的受访者赞成累进融资制度,即较富裕的群体将支付高于较贫穷群体的收入比例,而不是按照个人收入比例支付的制度(比例)。在坦桑尼亚,45%的总样本愿意为穷人的医疗保健付费。然而,在这三个国家,累进制度都得到了不太富裕群体的支持,而不是最富裕群体。团结被认为是特定社会政治文化的集体属性,基于共同的期望,并作为共同的、历史的学习过程的一部分而发展。这三个国家的医疗保险经历不同,这可能导致了各国之间在支付意愿方面的差异。建立和“生活在”提供负担得起的全民覆盖的机构可能是支持社会团结发展的学习过程的重要组成部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验