SBU, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ups J Med Sci. 2012 Aug;117(3):273-8. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2012.664179. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
Markers of renal function (glomerular filtration rate (GFR)) are frequently used in the Swedish health care. GFR is usually estimated based on plasma creatinine concentration, but plasma cystatin C concentration, creatinine clearance, iohexol clearance, and (51)Cr-EDTA clearance are also used. These markers are all part of the daily patient care, but there is little specific information on the clinical use of these markers. The aim of this study was to compare the use of these various GFR markers in different parts of Sweden and potential changes over time.
Retrospective study using questionnaires to collect information for the years 2006-2009 divided per county on the specific use of GFR markers with type of test reports.
Plasma/serum creatinine concentration (96%) is by far the dominating GFR marker in Sweden, while cystatin C concentration (3.5%), creatinine clearance (0.1%), iohexol clearance (0.1%), and 51Cr-EDTA clearance (0.1%) are less frequently used. The use of GFR markers, including creatinine, continues to increase on a national level with the exception of creatinine clearance and 51Cr-EDTA clearance. There were considerable variations between different counties in the use of GFR markers and the type of test reports that the laboratories provided.
The inter-county variations of GFR markers used in Sweden are large and indicate that savings associated with optimized test utilization in this regard could be substantial. Regional habits and traditions are likely to influence the variations in GFR marker use.
肾功能标志物(肾小球滤过率(GFR))常用于瑞典的医疗保健中。GFR 通常基于血浆肌酐浓度来估算,但也使用血浆胱抑素 C 浓度、肌酐清除率、碘海醇清除率和(51)Cr-EDTA 清除率。这些标志物都是日常患者护理的一部分,但关于这些标志物的临床应用,信息很少。本研究的目的是比较这些不同 GFR 标志物在瑞典不同地区的使用情况以及随时间的潜在变化。
回顾性研究使用问卷收集 2006-2009 年按县划分的关于 GFR 标志物具体使用情况的信息,包括测试报告的类型。
血浆/血清肌酐浓度(96%)是目前在瑞典使用最为广泛的 GFR 标志物,而胱抑素 C 浓度(3.5%)、肌酐清除率(0.1%)、碘海醇清除率(0.1%)和(51)Cr-EDTA 清除率(0.1%)则使用较少。除了肌酐清除率和(51)Cr-EDTA 清除率外,全国范围内包括肌酐在内的 GFR 标志物的使用持续增加。不同县之间在 GFR 标志物的使用和实验室提供的测试报告类型方面存在很大差异。
瑞典使用的 GFR 标志物的县际差异很大,表明在这方面优化测试利用可以节省大量成本。区域习惯和传统可能会影响 GFR 标志物使用的差异。