Scand Cardiovasc J. 2012 Jun;46(3):128-30. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2012.674550. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
This editorial discusses a report on the 1 year experience with temporary pacing, especially in the emergency setting, in several Norwegian district hospitals. The vast majority of the patients received transvenous temporary pacing, and the majority of leads were placed by noncardiologists. The procedure times were long and complications were frequent. The organization of emergency pacing is discussed, and we suggest that unless qualified physicians can establish transvenous pacing, the patients who need that should be transferred with transcutaneous pacing as back-up during transport to a hospital with more available competence. Ideally, those who need pacing immediately, including those who need permanent pacing, should be offered permanent implantation on a 24 hours/7 days per week base.
这篇社论讨论了一篇关于挪威几家地区医院在 1 年内临时起搏经验的报告,特别是在紧急情况下的经验。绝大多数患者接受了经静脉临时起搏,大多数导联由非心脏病专家放置。手术时间长,并发症频繁。文中讨论了紧急起搏的组织问题,我们建议除非有合格的医生能够进行经静脉起搏,否则需要起搏的患者应在转运至有更多能力的医院时,通过经皮起搏作为后备。理想情况下,应在每周 7 天每天 24 小时的基础上,为那些立即需要起搏的患者,包括那些需要永久性起搏的患者,提供永久性植入。