Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida 32209, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan 1;81(1):42-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24416. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
In patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, the adjunctive use of cilostazol is associated with enhanced platelet inhibition. However, if cilostazol exerts different pharmacodynamic (PD) effects according to levels of on-treatment platelet reactivity remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the PD effects of cilostazol in patients with and without high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status.
This is a post-hoc analysis derived from patients (n = 79) enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study comparing cilostazol with placebo in stable coronary artery disease patients on aspirin and clopidogrel therapy. In the present analysis, patients were divided according to the presence or absence of HPR (HPR and non-HPR). HPR was defined as a P2Y12 units (PRU) > 240 as assessed by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. The PD effects of cilostazol were evaluated in patients with and without HPR according to DM status.
Significant absolute changes in PRU values were observed after adjunctive cilostazol in both HPR [53.4 (95% CI 24.7-82.1), P = 0.001] and non-HPR [40.8 (95% CI 28.7-52.8), P < 0.0001] patients. This difference was statistically significant in HPR patients with DM (P = 0.001), but not without DM (P = 0.24), and in non-HPR patients with and without DM (P = 0.0001 for both). The greatest mean reduction in PRU was observed in HPR patients with DM (72.9; 95% CI 33.7-112.0). Thrombin generation was not affected by cilostazol, irrespective of HPR status.
Cilostazol reduces platelet reactivity both in HPR and non-HPR patients, although these PD effects are enhanced in HPR patients with DM. Nevertheless, larger studies are needed to better evaluate possible differential effects of cilostazol on platelet reactivity by diabetes status.
在接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗的患者中,联合使用西洛他唑可增强血小板抑制作用。然而,西洛他唑是否根据治疗中的血小板反应性(on-treatment platelet reactivity)水平产生不同的药效学(pharmacodynamic,PD)效应尚不清楚。本研究旨在根据糖尿病(diabetes mellitus,DM)状态,确定有和无高氯吡格雷血小板反应性(high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity,HPR)的患者中西洛他唑的 PD 效应。
这是一项源自于前瞻性、随机、双盲、双模拟、交叉研究的事后分析,该研究比较了西洛他唑与安慰剂在接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗的稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中的疗效。在本分析中,根据是否存在 HPR 将患者分为 HPR 组和非 HPR 组。HPR 定义为VerifyNow P2Y12 检测法评估的 P2Y12 单位(P2Y12 units,PRU)>240。根据 DM 状态,评估 HPR 患者和非 HPR 患者中西洛他唑的 PD 效应。
在 HPR 患者[53.4(95%置信区间 24.7-82.1),P=0.001]和非 HPR 患者[40.8(95%置信区间 28.7-52.8),P<0.0001]中,联合应用西洛他唑后 PRU 值的绝对变化有显著差异。在有 DM 的 HPR 患者中,这种差异具有统计学意义(P=0.001),但在无 DM 的 HPR 患者中无统计学意义(P=0.24),在有和无 DM 的非 HPR 患者中也无统计学意义(P=0.0001)。在有 DM 的 HPR 患者中,PRU 的平均降幅最大(72.9;95%置信区间 33.7-112.0)。西洛他唑对凝血酶生成没有影响,无论 HPR 状态如何。
西洛他唑可降低 HPR 患者和非 HPR 患者的血小板反应性,但在有 DM 的 HPR 患者中,这种 PD 效应增强。然而,需要更大规模的研究来更好地评估糖尿病状态对西洛他唑对血小板反应性的可能的差异作用。