Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Mar;19(3):304-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01295.x.
The specific objectives were: 1) to compare the characteristics and 6-month outcomes of community-dwelling seniors in Quebec, Canada, who visited three different emergency department (ED) types and 2) to explore whether the differences in outcomes by ED type were seen among subgroups of seniors.
The three types of ED were most specialized, less community-oriented (n = 12); moderately specialized, less community-oriented (n = 28); and least specialized, more community-oriented (n = 28). Administrative databases were used to create a cohort of 223,120 seniors who visited these 68 EDs during a 14-month period. Using a multilevel approach, the following patient characteristics were compared across ED types: sociodemographic (age, sex, urban vs. rural residence, proximity to ED); medical diagnoses and comorbidity burden; and utilization of hospital and physician services during the 16 months before the index ED visit. Cox regression analysis was used to model the relationships between ED type and two 6-month outcomes, adjusting for patient characteristics: 1) serious outcomes (death, acute or long term-care admission) among all individuals who made an index visit and 2) outpatient ED visits (without hospital admission) among those discharged either from the ED or hospital. Interactions between ED type and patient age, sex, urban-rural residence, and comorbidity burden were explored.
Compared to patients treated at the least specialized EDs, those at the most specialized EDs were more often urban-dwelling, resided outside the health service area of the ED, and had the highest disease burden and prior specialist utilization. Those treated at the moderately specialized EDs were intermediate between these two groups. During the 6 months after the ED visit, the rate of serious outcomes was higher and the rate of outpatient ED visits was lower for the most specialized compared to the least specialized EDs, even after adjustment for patient characteristics. The differences in these outcomes by ED type were attenuated among older patients and those with greater comorbidity.
More vulnerable community-dwelling seniors tend to be treated in more specialized EDs, which have worse linkages to community services. Improved linkages between more specialized EDs and the community (physicians, home care, and other services) and increased access to community services may improve outcomes in this population. Seniors treated at more specialized EDs were more likely to experience serious outcomes, but were less likely to make a return outpatient ED visit.
具体目标是:1)比较加拿大魁北克省居住在社区的老年人在访问三种不同急诊部(ED)时的特征和 6 个月的结果;2)探索 ED 类型的结果差异是否存在于老年人亚组中。
三种 ED 分别是:最专业、较少面向社区(n=12);中等专业、较少面向社区(n=28);最不专业、更面向社区(n=28)。使用行政数据库创建了一个队列,该队列由 223120 名在 14 个月期间访问这些 68 个 ED 的老年人组成。使用多水平方法,比较 ED 类型之间的以下患者特征:社会人口统计学(年龄、性别、城市与农村居住、接近 ED);医疗诊断和合并症负担;以及在指数 ED 就诊前 16 个月内的医院和医生服务的使用情况。使用 Cox 回归分析来建立 ED 类型与两个 6 个月结果之间的关系,调整患者特征:1)所有进行指数就诊的个体的严重结果(死亡、急性或长期护理入院);2)从 ED 或医院出院的个体的门诊 ED 就诊(无住院)。探索 ED 类型与患者年龄、性别、城乡居住和合并症负担之间的交互作用。
与在最不专业 ED 接受治疗的患者相比,在最专业 ED 接受治疗的患者更可能居住在城市,居住在 ED 服务区域之外,并且疾病负担和先前的专科就诊率最高。在这两组之间,中等专业 ED 治疗的患者处于中间位置。在 ED 就诊后 6 个月内,与最不专业 ED 相比,最专业 ED 的严重结果发生率更高,门诊 ED 就诊率更低,即使调整了患者特征。在年龄较大的患者和合并症较多的患者中,ED 类型对这些结果的影响有所减弱。
更多弱势的居住在社区的老年人往往在更专业的 ED 接受治疗,这些 ED 与社区服务的联系较差。改善更专业的 ED 与社区(医生、家庭护理和其他服务)之间的联系,并增加对社区服务的获取,可能会改善这一人群的结果。在更专业的 ED 接受治疗的老年人更有可能出现严重结果,但不太可能再次进行门诊 ED 就诊。