Suppr超能文献

HEDIS 儿童免疫措施的准确性和有用性。

Accuracy and usefulness of the HEDIS childhood immunization measures.

机构信息

Division of Quality and Safety, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2012 Apr;129(4):648-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3073. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

With the use of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) immunization recommendations as the gold standard, our objectives were to measure the accuracy ("is this child up-to-date on immunizations?") and usefulness ("is this child due for catch-up immunizations?") of the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) childhood immunization measures.

METHODS

For children aged 24 to 35 months from the 2009 National Immunization Survey, we assessed the accuracy and usefulness of the HEDIS childhood immunization measures for 6 individual immunizations and a composite.

RESULTS

A total of 12 096 children met all inclusion criteria and composed the study sample. The HEDIS measures had >90% accuracy when compared with the CDC gold standard for each of the 6 immunizations (range, 94.3%-99.7%) and the composite (93.8%). The HEDIS measure was least accurate for hepatitis B and pneumococcal conjugate immunizations. The proportion of children for which the HEDIS measure yielded a nonuseful result (ie, an incorrect answer to the question, "is this child due for catch-up immunization?") ranged from 0.33% (varicella) to 5.96% (pneumococcal conjugate). The most important predictor of HEDIS measure accuracy and usefulness was the CDC-recommended number of immunizations due at age 2 years; children with zero or all immunizations due were the most likely to be correctly classified.

CONCLUSIONS

HEDIS childhood immunization measures are, on the whole, accurate and useful. Certain immunizations (eg, hepatitis B, pneumococcal conjugate) and children (eg, those with a single overdue immunization), however, are more prone to HEDIS misclassification.

摘要

目的

以疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)免疫建议为金标准,我们的目标是衡量医疗保健效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)儿童免疫措施的准确性(“这个孩子的免疫接种是否及时?”)和实用性(“这个孩子是否需要补种免疫接种?”)。

方法

对于 2009 年全国免疫调查中年龄在 24 至 35 个月的儿童,我们评估了 HEDIS 儿童免疫措施对 6 种单种免疫和复合免疫的准确性和实用性。

结果

共有 12096 名儿童符合所有纳入标准,构成了研究样本。与 CDC 金标准相比,HEDIS 措施在每种 6 种免疫接种(范围为 94.3%-99.7%)和复合免疫接种(93.8%)中的准确性均超过 90%。HEDIS 措施对乙型肝炎和肺炎球菌结合免疫的准确性最低。HEDIS 措施得出无用结果(即,“这个孩子是否需要补种免疫接种?”)的儿童比例范围从 0.33%(水痘)到 5.96%(肺炎球菌结合)。HEDIS 措施准确性和实用性的最重要预测因素是 CDC 建议的 2 岁时应接种的免疫次数;零次或所有免疫次数均未接种的儿童最有可能被正确分类。

结论

总体而言,HEDIS 儿童免疫措施是准确和有用的。然而,某些免疫接种(例如乙型肝炎、肺炎球菌结合)和儿童(例如只有一次逾期免疫接种的儿童)更容易被 HEDIS 错误分类。

相似文献

1
Accuracy and usefulness of the HEDIS childhood immunization measures.HEDIS 儿童免疫措施的准确性和有用性。
Pediatrics. 2012 Apr;129(4):648-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3073. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

本文引用的文献

4
The approaching revolution in quality measurement.质量测量领域即将到来的变革。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Jul;35(7):358. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35050-3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验