Suppr超能文献

HEDIS 儿童免疫措施的准确性和有用性。

Accuracy and usefulness of the HEDIS childhood immunization measures.

机构信息

Division of Quality and Safety, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2012 Apr;129(4):648-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3073. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

With the use of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) immunization recommendations as the gold standard, our objectives were to measure the accuracy ("is this child up-to-date on immunizations?") and usefulness ("is this child due for catch-up immunizations?") of the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) childhood immunization measures.

METHODS

For children aged 24 to 35 months from the 2009 National Immunization Survey, we assessed the accuracy and usefulness of the HEDIS childhood immunization measures for 6 individual immunizations and a composite.

RESULTS

A total of 12 096 children met all inclusion criteria and composed the study sample. The HEDIS measures had >90% accuracy when compared with the CDC gold standard for each of the 6 immunizations (range, 94.3%-99.7%) and the composite (93.8%). The HEDIS measure was least accurate for hepatitis B and pneumococcal conjugate immunizations. The proportion of children for which the HEDIS measure yielded a nonuseful result (ie, an incorrect answer to the question, "is this child due for catch-up immunization?") ranged from 0.33% (varicella) to 5.96% (pneumococcal conjugate). The most important predictor of HEDIS measure accuracy and usefulness was the CDC-recommended number of immunizations due at age 2 years; children with zero or all immunizations due were the most likely to be correctly classified.

CONCLUSIONS

HEDIS childhood immunization measures are, on the whole, accurate and useful. Certain immunizations (eg, hepatitis B, pneumococcal conjugate) and children (eg, those with a single overdue immunization), however, are more prone to HEDIS misclassification.

摘要

目的

以疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)免疫建议为金标准,我们的目标是衡量医疗保健效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)儿童免疫措施的准确性(“这个孩子的免疫接种是否及时?”)和实用性(“这个孩子是否需要补种免疫接种?”)。

方法

对于 2009 年全国免疫调查中年龄在 24 至 35 个月的儿童,我们评估了 HEDIS 儿童免疫措施对 6 种单种免疫和复合免疫的准确性和实用性。

结果

共有 12096 名儿童符合所有纳入标准,构成了研究样本。与 CDC 金标准相比,HEDIS 措施在每种 6 种免疫接种(范围为 94.3%-99.7%)和复合免疫接种(93.8%)中的准确性均超过 90%。HEDIS 措施对乙型肝炎和肺炎球菌结合免疫的准确性最低。HEDIS 措施得出无用结果(即,“这个孩子是否需要补种免疫接种?”)的儿童比例范围从 0.33%(水痘)到 5.96%(肺炎球菌结合)。HEDIS 措施准确性和实用性的最重要预测因素是 CDC 建议的 2 岁时应接种的免疫次数;零次或所有免疫次数均未接种的儿童最有可能被正确分类。

结论

总体而言,HEDIS 儿童免疫措施是准确和有用的。然而,某些免疫接种(例如乙型肝炎、肺炎球菌结合)和儿童(例如只有一次逾期免疫接种的儿童)更容易被 HEDIS 错误分类。

相似文献

1
Accuracy and usefulness of the HEDIS childhood immunization measures.
Pediatrics. 2012 Apr;129(4):648-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3073. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
2
The immunization delivery effectiveness assessment score: a better immunization measure?
Pediatrics. 2003 Jul;112(1 Pt 1):e39-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.1.e39.
5
Managed care organizations' performance in delivery of adolescent immunizations, HEDIS, 1999-2002.
J Adolesc Health. 2008 Feb;42(2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.030. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
6
Physician knowledge of catch-up regimens and contraindications for childhood immunizations.
Pediatrics. 2003 May;111(5 Pt 1):925-32. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.5.925.
8
A pathway to developing and testing quality measures aimed at improving adult vaccination rates in the United States.
Vaccine. 2019 Feb 28;37(10):1277-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.044. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
9
Pharmacotherapy for incident attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: practice patterns and quality metrics.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Aug;30(8):1687-99. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.905461. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
10
Improving immunization delivery using an electronic health record: the ImmProve project.
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Sep-Oct;13(5):458-65. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the vaccination coverage: validity of household-hold vaccination booklet and caregiver's recall.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Sep 2;17(9):3034-3041. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1906151. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
2
Improving immunization delivery using an electronic health record: the ImmProve project.
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Sep-Oct;13(5):458-65. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving timely childhood immunizations through pay for performance in Medicaid-managed care.
Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec;45(6 Pt 2):1934-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01168.x. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
2
Effect of financial incentives on improvement in medical quality indicators for primary care.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):622-31. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.070187.
4
The approaching revolution in quality measurement.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Jul;35(7):358. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35050-3.
6
Improving the quality of quality measurement: the tinkerer, the tailor and the candlestick maker.
Med Care. 2009 Apr;47(4):375-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a14b65.
9
How should immunization rates be measured in the office setting? A study from PROS and NMA PedsNet.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2008 Apr;47(3):252-60. doi: 10.1177/0009922807308743. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
10
A pediatric-focused review of the performance incentive literature.
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2007 Dec;19(6):719-25. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3282f1eb70.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验