• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吊带折叠术治疗复发性压力性尿失禁

Sling plication for recurrent stress urinary incontinence.

作者信息

Patterson Danielle, Rajan Sujatha, Kohli Neeraj

机构信息

From the Division of Urogynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010 Sep;16(5):307-9. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181ed3fc3.

DOI:10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181ed3fc3
PMID:22453511
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

: Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after synthetic mid-urethral sling placement is a challenging clinical dilemma. This case series describes a safe, minimally invasive treatment option for recurrent SUI after failure of the primary mid-urethral sling procedure.

METHODS

: Twenty women with recurrent SUI after previous synthetic mid-urethral sling placement underwent plication of the sling with 2-0 polyester suture under intravenous sedation with an intra-operative cough stress test between December 2004 and December 2008. A retrospective chart review was performed to obtain pertinent preoperative and postoperative data.

RESULTS

: Nine of the patients had prior retropubic synthetic mid-urethral slings. The other 11 women had transobturator mid-urethral slings, 10 of whom had slings via the outside-in approach and 1 had a single-incision mini-sling placed. The mean patient age was 59.8 years (range 38-83 years). Sling plication was performed at a median of 159.5 days after initial sling placement (range 26-2090 days). Overall 85% of patients had subjective improvement in SUI after sling plication with a median follow-up of 54.5 days (range 29-972 days). Those patients with prior retropubic slings had a 100% improvement rate compared to 72% improvement with prior obturator slings (P = 0.22). The subjective cure rate was 65%, 88% for the retropubic slings and 45% for the transobturator slings (P = 0.07). There were no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

: Midline plication of previously placed synthetic mid-urethral slings is a safe and effective method of treating recurrent SUI.

摘要

目的

合成材料经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术(mid-urethral sling,MUS)后复发性压力性尿失禁(stress urinary incontinence,SUI)的处理是一个具有挑战性的临床难题。本病例系列描述了一种针对初次MUS手术失败后复发性SUI的安全、微创治疗选择。

方法

2004年12月至2008年12月期间,20例既往接受过合成材料经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术的复发性SUI患者在静脉镇静下,使用2-0聚酯缝线对吊带进行折叠,并进行术中咳嗽压力试验。通过回顾性病历审查获取相关术前和术后数据。

结果

9例患者曾接受耻骨后合成材料经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术。另外11例女性接受了经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术,其中10例通过由外向内法放置吊带,1例放置了单切口迷你吊带。患者平均年龄为59.8岁(范围38 - 83岁)。吊带折叠手术在初次吊带放置后中位数为159.5天进行(范围26 - 2090天)。总体而言,85%的患者在吊带折叠术后SUI有主观改善,中位随访时间为54.5天(范围29 - 972天)。既往接受耻骨后吊带术的患者改善率为100%,而既往接受闭孔吊带术的患者改善率为72%(P = 0.22)。主观治愈率为65%,耻骨后吊带术患者为88%,经闭孔吊带术患者为45%(P = 0.07)。无并发症发生。

结论

对先前放置的合成材料经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带进行中线折叠术是治疗复发性SUI的一种安全有效的方法。

相似文献

1
Sling plication for recurrent stress urinary incontinence.吊带折叠术治疗复发性压力性尿失禁
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010 Sep;16(5):307-9. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181ed3fc3.
2
Outcomes following repeat mid urethral synthetic sling after failure of the initial sling procedure: rediscovery of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure.初次吊带手术失败后重复进行中段尿道合成吊带手术的结果:无张力阴道吊带手术的重新发现
J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1370-4; discussion 1374. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.147. Epub 2007 Aug 16.
3
[Repeat mid-urethral sling procedure for recurrent female urinary stress incontinence after previous mid-urethral sling].[既往经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术后复发性女性压力性尿失禁的重复经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带手术]
Prog Urol. 2013 Apr;23(4):262-9. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.01.020. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
4
Repeat synthetic mid urethral sling procedure for women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence.对复发性压力性尿失禁的女性重复合成中段尿道吊带手术。
J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.111.
5
Mid-urethral synthetic slings in the treatment of urodynamic female stress urinary incontinence without concomitant pelvic prolapse repair: 4-year health-related quality of life outcomes.经尿道中段合成吊带治疗无合并盆腔脏器脱垂修补的尿动力学女性压力性尿失禁:4 年健康相关生活质量结局。
BJU Int. 2010 Feb;105(4):514-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08837.x. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
6
Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials.中段尿道吊带术的并发症:未来临床试验的重要结果
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):1890-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.029. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
7
The fate of synthetic mid-urethral slings in 2013: A turning point.2013年合成材料中段尿道吊带的命运:一个转折点。
Arab J Urol. 2013 Jun;11(2):117-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
8
Sling Plication for Failed Midurethral Sling Procedures: A Case Series.针对失败的中段尿道吊带手术的吊带折叠术:病例系列
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan/Feb;25(1):e4-e6. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000630.
9
A randomized, controlled trial comparing an innovative single incision sling with an established transobturator sling to treat female stress urinary incontinence.一项比较创新性单切口吊带与已确立的经闭孔吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验。
J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.083. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
10
Sling location in women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence following midurethral sling.经阴道吊带术后复发性压力性尿失禁女性的吊带位置。
Urology. 2012 Jan;79(1):76-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Sling plication for persistent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling.中段尿道吊带术后持续性压力性尿失禁的吊带折叠术
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Apr;34(4):957-959. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05379-z. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
2
Second-Line Surgical Management After Midurethral Sling Failure.经尿道中段吊带术失败后的二线手术治疗
Int Neurourol J. 2021 Jun;25(2):111-118. doi: 10.5213/inj.2040278.139. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
Management of patients with stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling.经尿道中段吊带术失败后压力性尿失禁患者的管理
Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 Jun;11(6Suppl2):S143-S146. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4610.
4
Vaginal excision of the sub-urethral sling: analysis of indications, safety and outcome.经阴道切除尿道下吊带:适应症、安全性及结果分析
Arch Med Sci. 2015 Oct 12;11(5):982-8. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2014.42305.