Department of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Kingston upon Hull, England.
Eur Neurol. 2012;67(5):272-8. doi: 10.1159/000336538. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
In the early 19th century the prevailing alienist (psychiatrists') view was that organic lesions did not cause madness. The history of general paralysis of the insane (GPI) rests on four early publications which changed this concept: Haslam's Observations on insanity, Bayle's Recherches sur l'arachnitis chronique, Calmeil's De la paralysie considérée chez les aliénés, and Esmarch and Jessen's Syphilis und Geistesstörung. Haslam's account is unconvincing, but Bayle's report linking mental alienation with organic brain disease was a polemic that opposed established teachings. Calmeil and Delaye emphasised clinicopathological correlation and stressed the importance of white matter disease in causing dementia. GPI was to prove a crucial starting point in which the causes of mental illness were slowly transformed from psychogenic disturbances of mind and spirits to organically determined diseases.
在 19 世纪早期,当时占主导地位的精神病学家观点认为,器质性病变不会导致精神错乱。慢性麻痹性精神病(General Paralysis of the Insane,GPI)的历史建立在四个早期出版物之上,这些出版物改变了这一概念:哈斯拉姆的《关于精神错乱的观察》、贝利的《慢性蛛网膜炎研究》、卡尔梅伊的《论精神病人的麻痹》以及埃斯马克和耶森的《梅毒与精神障碍》。哈斯拉姆的描述令人难以置信,但贝利的报告将精神错乱与器质性脑疾病联系起来,这是一种反对既定教义的辩论。卡尔梅伊和德莱强调临床病理相关性,并强调白质疾病在导致痴呆方面的重要性。GPI 被证明是一个关键的起点,在此基础上,精神疾病的病因逐渐从心理和精神的心理性精神障碍转变为器质性疾病。