• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险调整死亡率:问题与可能性。

Risk-adjusted mortality: problems and possibilities.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.

出版信息

Comput Math Methods Med. 2012;2012:829465. doi: 10.1155/2012/829465. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1155/2012/829465
PMID:22474540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3312252/
Abstract

The ratio of observed-to-expected deaths is considered a measure of hospital quality and for this reason will soon become a basis for payment. However, there are drivers of that metric more potent than quality: most important are medical documentation and patient acuity. If hositals underdocument and therefore do not capture the full "expected mortality" they may be tempted to lower their observed/expected ratio by reducing "observed mortality" through limiting access to the very ill. Underdocumentation occurs because hospitals do not recognize, and therefore cannot seek to confirm, specific comorbidities conferring high mortality risk. To help hospitals identify these comorbidities, this paper describes an easily implemented spread-sheet for evaluating comorbid conditions associated, in any particular hospital, with each discharge. This method identifies comorbidities that increase in frequency as mortality risk increases within each diagnostic grouping. The method is inductive and therefore independent of any particular risk-adjustment technique.

摘要

观察到的与预期的死亡比例被认为是衡量医院质量的一个指标,因此很快将成为支付的基础。然而,有一些比质量更能驱动这一指标的因素:最重要的是医疗文件和患者的严重程度。如果医院记录不完整,因此无法完全捕捉到“预期死亡率”,他们可能会通过限制对非常病重的患者的治疗来降低观察到的/预期的死亡率。记录不完整是因为医院没有认识到(因此无法寻求确认)具体的合并症,这些合并症会带来高死亡率风险。为了帮助医院识别这些合并症,本文描述了一个易于实施的电子表格,用于评估与每个出院相关的、与特定医院相关的合并情况。该方法确定了在每个诊断分组中,随着死亡率风险的增加而频率增加的合并症。该方法是归纳性的,因此不依赖于任何特定的风险调整技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb28/3312252/5acfb7d6c92a/CMMM2012-829465.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb28/3312252/6ef635127371/CMMM2012-829465.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb28/3312252/5acfb7d6c92a/CMMM2012-829465.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb28/3312252/6ef635127371/CMMM2012-829465.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb28/3312252/5acfb7d6c92a/CMMM2012-829465.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk-adjusted mortality: problems and possibilities.风险调整死亡率:问题与可能性。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2012;2012:829465. doi: 10.1155/2012/829465. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
2
Development and testing of a systemic lupus-specific risk adjustment index for in-hospital mortality.一种用于住院死亡率的系统性红斑狼疮特异性风险调整指数的开发与测试。
J Rheumatol. 2000 Jun;27(6):1408-13.
3
Impact of different measures of comorbid disease on predicted mortality of intensive care unit patients.合并症的不同衡量指标对重症监护病房患者预测死亡率的影响。
Med Care. 2002 Oct;40(10):929-40. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200210000-00010.
4
Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.使用来自 6 个国家的数据更新和验证 Charlson 合并症指数和评分,以用于医院出院摘要的风险调整。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar 15;173(6):676-82. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq433. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
5
Hospital mortality in older patients in the Brazilian Unified Health System, Southeast region.巴西统一卫生系统东南部地区老年患者的医院死亡率。
Rev Saude Publica. 2018 Jul 23;52:69. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000146.
6
Disability as a covariate in risk adjustment models for predicting hospital deaths.将残疾作为预测医院死亡的风险调整模型中的协变量。
Ann Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;24(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
7
The impact of under coding of cardiac severity and comorbid diseases on the accuracy of hospital report cards.
Med Care. 2005 Aug;43(8):801-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000170414.55821.27.
8
Variation in outcomes in Veterans Affairs intensive care units with a computerized severity measure.使用计算机化严重程度测量法时退伍军人事务部重症监护病房的结果差异。
Crit Care Med. 2005 May;33(5):930-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000162497.86229.e9.
9
Automated computerized intensive care unit severity of illness measure in the Department of Veterans Affairs: preliminary results. SISVistA Investigators. Scrutiny of ICU Severity Veterans Health Sysyems Technology Architecture.美国退伍军人事务部重症监护病房疾病严重程度的自动化计算机测量:初步结果。SISVistA研究人员。对重症监护病房严重程度的退伍军人健康系统技术架构的审查。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Oct;28(10):3540-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200010000-00033.
10
A Novel Model Demonstrates Variation in Risk-Adjusted Mortality Across Pediatric Cardiac ICUs After Surgery.一种新模型展示了手术后儿科心脏 ICU 风险调整死亡率的变化。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;20(2):136-142. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001776.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with regional differences in healthcare quality for patients with acute myocardial infarction in Japan.日本急性心肌梗死患者医疗质量地区差异的相关因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0319179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319179. eCollection 2025.
2
Not Only Caseload but Also Patient Selection Is Predictive of Mortality After Pancreatic Resection.不仅病例数量,患者选择也可预测胰腺切除术后的死亡率。
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Dec 30;6(1):e536. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000536. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Hospital Characteristics Associated with Observed Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Prices.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare Hospital Value-Based Purchasing: the evolution toward linking Medicare reimbursment to health care quality continues.医疗保险医院价值导向型采购:医疗保险报销与医疗质量挂钩的演变仍在继续。
Health Care Law Mon. 2011 Feb;2011(2):2-9.
2
Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.入院时存在指标对医院质量评估的影响:医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)住院患者质量指标的经验
Med Care. 2008 Feb;46(2):112-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318158aed6.
3
Stroke mortality and race: does access to care influence outcomes?
与观察到的经导管主动脉瓣置换术价格相关的医院特征
medRxiv. 2024 May 20:2024.05.20.24307421. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.20.24307421.
4
Stability of hospital quality indicators over time: A multi-year observational study of German hospital data.医院质量指标随时间的稳定性:德国医院数据的多年观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 7;18(11):e0293723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293723. eCollection 2023.
5
Hospital-level factors associated with death during pneumonia-associated hospitalization among adults-New York City, 2010-2014.与成人肺炎相关住院期间死亡相关的医院级别因素-纽约市,2010-2014 年。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 7;16(10):e0256678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256678. eCollection 2021.
6
Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review.医生评级网站的数据质量问题:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 28;22(9):e15916. doi: 10.2196/15916.
7
Mortality related to drug-resistant organisms in surgical sepsis-3: an 8-year time trend study using sequential organ failure assessment scores.手术脓毒症中与耐药菌相关的死亡率-3:使用序贯器官衰竭评估评分的 8 年时间趋势研究。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;40(3):535-540. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04037-w. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
8
Outcomes of Nurse Practitioner-Delivered Critical Care: A Prospective Cohort Study.执业护士提供重症护理的结果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Chest. 2016 May;149(5):1146-54. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.015. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
9
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction at Non-PCI Capable Hospitals in 2007 and in 2014.2007年和2014年非具备PCI能力医院急性心肌梗死患者的特征及转归
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:359372. doi: 10.1155/2015/359372. Epub 2015 Oct 4.
Am J Med Sci. 2007 Jun;333(6):327-32. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318065c101.
4
Comparing hospice and nonhospice patient survival among patients who die within a three-year window.比较在三年窗口期内死亡的患者中临终关怀患者与非临终关怀患者的生存率。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Mar;33(3):238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.010.
5
Accuracy of hospital report cards based on administrative data.基于行政数据的医院报告卡的准确性。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 1):1413-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00554.x.
6
Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.用于行政数据的共病测量方法。
Med Care. 1998 Jan;36(1):8-27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004.
7
Assessing quality using administrative data.使用行政数据评估质量。
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 15;127(8 Pt 2):666-74. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00048.
8
The risks of risk adjustment.风险调整的风险。
JAMA. 1997 Nov 19;278(19):1600-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.19.1600.
9
Judging hospitals by severity-adjusted mortality rates: the influence of the severity-adjustment method.通过严重程度调整后的死亡率来评判医院:严重程度调整方法的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1996 Oct;86(10):1379-87. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.10.1379.
10
How severity measures rate hospitalized patients.严重程度评估如何对住院患者进行评级。
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 May;11(5):303-11. doi: 10.1007/BF02598273.