Chao Chun, Tang Beth, Hurley Leo, Silverberg Michael J, Towner William, Preciado Melissa, Horberg Michael
Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2012 Dec;28(12):1630-6. doi: 10.1089/AID.2012.0005. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
We investigated risk factors for unfavorable virologic responses among HIV-infected patients who recently switched antiretroviral regimens. We identified HIV-infected patients who switched antiretroviral regimens (defined as adding ≥2 new medications) between 2001 and 2008 at Kaiser Permanente California. Virological response, measured after 6 months on the new regimen, was classified as (1) maximal viral suppression (HIV RNA <75/ml), (2) low-level viremia (LLV; 75-5000/ml), or (3) advanced virologic failure (>5000/ml). Potential risk factors examined included (1) HIV disease factors, e.g., prior AIDS, CD4 cell count; (2) history of antiretroviral use, e.g., therapy classes of the newly switched regimen, medication adherence, and virologic failure at previous regimens; and (3) novel patient-level factors including comorbidities and healthcare utilization. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for LLV and advanced virologic failure were obtained from multivariable nominal logistic regression models. A total of 3447 patients were included; 2608 (76%) achieved maximal viral suppression, 420 (12%) had LLV, and 419 (12%) developed advanced virologic failure. Factors positively associated with LLV and advanced virologic failure included number of regimens prior to switch [aOR(per regimen)=1.38 (1.17-1.62) and 1.77 (1.50-2.08), respectively], nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor-only regimens (vs. protease inhibitor-based) [aOR=2.78 (1.28-6.04) and 5.10 (2.38-10.90), respectively], and virologic failure at previous regimens [aOR=3.15 (2.17-4.57) and 4.71 (2.84-7.81), respectively]. Older age, higher CD4 cell count, and medication adherence were protective for unfavorable virologic outcomes. Antiretroviral regimen-level factors and immunodeficiency were significantly associated with virologic failure after a recent therapy switch and should be considered when making treatment change decisions.
我们调查了近期更换抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的HIV感染患者出现不良病毒学反应的风险因素。我们确定了2001年至2008年期间在加利福尼亚州凯撒医疗机构更换抗逆转录病毒治疗方案(定义为添加≥2种新药物)的HIV感染患者。在新方案治疗6个月后测量的病毒学反应分为:(1)最大程度病毒抑制(HIV RNA<75/ml),(2)低水平病毒血症(LLV;75 - 5000/ml),或(3)严重病毒学失败(>5000/ml)。所检查的潜在风险因素包括:(1)HIV疾病因素,例如既往艾滋病、CD4细胞计数;(2)抗逆转录病毒治疗使用史,例如新更换方案的治疗类别、用药依从性以及既往方案的病毒学失败情况;(3)新的患者层面因素,包括合并症和医疗服务利用情况。通过多变量名义逻辑回归模型获得LLV和严重病毒学失败的调整优势比(aOR)。总共纳入3447例患者;2608例(76%)实现了最大程度病毒抑制,420例(12%)出现LLV,419例(12%)发生严重病毒学失败。与LLV和严重病毒学失败呈正相关的因素包括更换前的治疗方案数量[aOR(每增加一个方案)分别为1.38(1.17 - 1.62)和1.77(1.50 - 2.08)]、仅使用核苷酸类逆转录酶抑制剂的方案(与基于蛋白酶抑制剂的方案相比)[aOR分别为2.78(1.28 - 6.04)和5.10(2.38 - 10.90)]以及既往方案的病毒学失败情况[aOR分别为3.15(2.17 - 4.57)和4.71(2.84 - 7.81)]。年龄较大、CD4细胞计数较高以及用药依从性对不良病毒学结局具有保护作用。抗逆转录病毒治疗方案层面因素和免疫缺陷与近期治疗更换后的病毒学失败显著相关,在做出治疗变更决策时应予以考虑。