Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 238 Burnett Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588-0308, USA.
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Oct;41(5):1199-208. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9927-5. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
Few studies have focused on intragroup variations in sexual orientation and fewer on self-identified heterosexuals with same-sex attractions, fantasies, and/or behaviors. Self-identified heterosexual students at a large public midwestern university (N = 263) completed measures of sexuality and gender, attitudes toward lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people, religious and political beliefs, emotional well-being, and demographics. The sample included 82 individuals (31%; labeled "H+") who endorsed same-sex attraction, fantasy, and/or behavior and 181 (69%; labeled "H") who did not. Women were more likely to be categorized as H+ than men. H+ participants had more positive attitudes toward lesbians and gay and bisexual men and reported more support for LGB-positive public policies than did H participants. H+ participants reported less literalistic beliefs about religious scripture than did H participants. H and H+ groups did not differ significantly on measures of emotional well-being. Results were discussed in the context of recent literature arguing for a more nuanced and gender-differentiated approach toward assessing sexual orientation, as well as literature on the flexibility of sexual orientation and on heterosexual identity development.
很少有研究关注性取向的群体内差异,更少关注自认为是异性恋但有同性吸引、幻想和/或行为的人。在一所中西部大型公立大学的 263 名自认为是异性恋的学生完成了性和性别、对男女同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者(LGB)的态度、宗教和政治信仰、情感健康和人口统计的测量。样本包括 82 名(31%;标记为“H+”)有同性吸引、幻想和/或行为的人,以及 181 名(69%;标记为“H”)没有的人。女性比男性更有可能被归类为 H+。H+参与者对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的态度更为积极,并且比 H 参与者更支持有利于 LGB 的公共政策。H+参与者对宗教经文的字面理解信念比 H 参与者弱。H 和 H+组在情感健康的衡量标准上没有显著差异。结果在讨论时参考了最近的文献,这些文献主张对性取向进行更细致和性别差异化的评估方法,以及关于性取向的灵活性和异性恋认同发展的文献。