Aversives, fundamental rights and the courts.
作者信息
Sherman R A
机构信息
Esquire Gaffin & Krattenmaker, P.C.Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
出版信息
Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;14(2):197-206. doi: 10.1007/BF03392570.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Aversives, fundamental rights and the courts.
Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;14(2):197-206. doi: 10.1007/BF03392570.
2
Does punishment hurt? The impact of aversives on the clinician.惩罚会造成伤害吗？厌恶刺激对临床医生的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 1991;12(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(91)90020-s.
3
HIV/AIDS and the South African Bill of Rights, with specific reference to the approach and role of the courts.
Afr J AIDS Res. 2004 Nov;3(2):113-9. doi: 10.2989/16085900409490325.
4
What can behavior analysis learn from the aversives controversy?行为分析能从厌恶疗法争议中学到什么？
Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;14(2):187-96. doi: 10.1007/BF03392569.
5
The Moderating Influence of International Courts on Social Movements: Evidence from the IVF Case Against Costa Rica.国际法院对社会运动的调节作用：来自针对哥斯达黎加的试管婴儿案例的证据。
Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun;19(1):149-160.
6
The Role of Courts in Shaping Health Equity.法院在塑造健康公平方面的作用。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Oct;42(5):749-770. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3940432. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
7
The courts, health care reform, and the reconstruction of American social legislation.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Summer;18(2):439-76. doi: 10.1215/03616878-18-2-439.
8
A satisfied clientele seeking more diverse services: Latinos and the courts.
Behav Sci Law. 2001;19(2):237-48. doi: 10.1002/bsl.436.
9
Abortion law in England: the medicalization of a crime.英国的堕胎法：一项罪行的医学化。
Law Med Health Care. 1990 Spring-Summer;18(1-2):146-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1990.tb01143.x.
10
Patients' rights--why the Australian courts have rejected 'Bolam'.患者权利——为何澳大利亚法院驳回了“博勒姆案”判例
J Med Ethics. 1995 Feb;21(1):5-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.1.5.
引用本文的文献
1
Contingent Electric Skin Shock: An Empirical or Ideological Issue?偶然的电击皮肤疗法：一个实证问题还是意识形态问题？
Perspect Behav Sci. 2023 Jun 26;46(2):329-337. doi: 10.1007/s40614-023-00380-3. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
A case study in the misrepresentation of applied behavior analysis in autism: the gernsbacher lectures.自闭症应用行为分析失实陈述的一个案例研究：格恩斯巴赫讲座
Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;32(1):205-40. doi: 10.1007/BF03392184.
3
What can behavior analysis learn from the aversives controversy?行为分析能从厌恶疗法争议中学到什么？
Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;14(2):187-96. doi: 10.1007/BF03392569.
本文引用的文献
1
Knecht v. Gillman. 5 Dec 1973.
Fed Report. 1973;488:1136-41.
2
Class action and the right to treatment.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1974 Jul;25(7):449-52. doi: 10.1176/ps.25.7.449.
3
Clinical evaluation of the self-injurious behavior inhibiting system (SIBIS).自伤行为抑制系统（SIBIS）的临床评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Spring;23(1):53-78. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-53.
Zotero 插件