Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Apr;72(4):954-60. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824657c4.
The treatment of coagulopathy and bleeding in severe trauma requires rapid delivery of large amounts of plasma to emergency wards. The resulting need for adequate supplies of nonfrozen or thawed plasma has consequences for storage strategies. Using extensive population data from a setting where both fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and cold-stored liquid plasma were used, this study investigates whether there is an association between short-term mortality after receipt of FFP or liquid plasma of different storage times.
A cohort of 84,986 Swedish patients was followed up from first recorded allogenic plasma transfusion for 14-day mortality. Associations with exposure to FFP were expressed as relative risks adjusted for patient characteristics, total transfusions, hospital, and calendar year. For non-FFP, the units given to patients who died and matched patients who survived were compared for their duration of storage.
The relative risk of exposure to FFP was 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.27, p < 0.0001), with the risk elevation confined to the earlier calendar years of the study. There was no evidence of any effect of storage time of non-FFP. In analyses of all plasma types, FFP from male donors had lowest risk.
Compared with exclusive use of never-frozen plasma, FFP was associated with increased short-term mortality in the era before leukocyte depletion. FFP from female donors had a significantly higher risk than male FFP. For non-FFP, duration of storage was unrelated to mortality. These findings can help to inform policies for managing high plasma demand in critical care.
严重创伤患者的凝血功能障碍和出血治疗需要迅速输注大量血浆到急诊病房。这导致对非冷冻或解冻血浆的充足供应有存储策略方面的后果。本研究利用来自同时使用新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)和冷藏液体血浆的环境中的大量人群数据,调查在接受 FFP 或不同储存时间的液体血浆后,短期死亡率是否存在关联。
对 84986 名瑞典患者的队列进行了随访,从首次记录的同种异体血浆输注开始,观察 14 天死亡率。FFP 暴露的相关性表示为调整患者特征、总输血、医院和日历年后的相对风险。对于非 FFP,比较死亡患者和存活患者的输注单位,以比较其储存时间。
暴露于 FFP 的相对风险为 1.19(95%置信区间:1.12-1.27,p < 0.0001),风险升高仅限于研究的早期日历年。没有证据表明非 FFP 的储存时间有任何影响。在所有血浆类型的分析中,来自男性供体的 FFP 风险最低。
与仅使用从未冷冻过的血浆相比,FFP 在白细胞去除之前的时代与短期死亡率增加相关。女性供体的 FFP 风险明显高于男性 FFP。对于非 FFP,储存时间与死亡率无关。这些发现可以帮助制定管理重症监护中高血浆需求的政策。