Unidad de Toxicología, Instituto de Bioingeniería, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Avda. Universidad s.n. ES-03202, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Toxicology. 2012 Jul 16;297(1-3):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
Some effects of organophosphorus compounds (OPs) esters cannot be explained by action on currently recognized targets. In this work, we evaluate and characterize the interaction (inhibition, reactivation and "ongoing inhibition") of two model compounds: paraoxon (non-neuropathy-inducer) and mipafox (neuropathy-inducer), with esterases of chicken brain membranes, an animal model, tissue and fractions, where neuropathy target esterase (NTE) was first described and isolated. Four enzymatic components were discriminated. The relative sensitivity of time-progressive inhibition differed for paraoxon and mipafox. The most sensitive component for paraoxon was also the most sensitive component for mipafox (EPα: 4.4-8.3% of activity), with I(50) (30 min) of 15-43 nM with paraoxon and 29 nM with mipafox, and it spontaneously reactivated after inhibition with paraoxon. The second most sensitive component to paraoxon (EPβ: 38.3% of activity) had I(50) (30 min) of 1540 nM, and was practically resistant to mipafox. The third component (EPγ: 38.6-47.6% of activity) was paraoxon-resistant and sensitive to micromolar concentrations of mipafox; this component meets the operational criteria of being NTE (target of organophosphorus-induced delayed neuropathy). It had I(50) (30 min) of 5.3-6.6 μM with mipafox. The fourth component (EPδ: 9.8-10.7% of activity) was practically resistant to both inhibitors. Two paraoxon-resistant and mipafox-sensitive esterases were found using the sequential assay removing paraoxon, but only one was paraoxon-resistant and mipafox-sensitive according to the assay without removing paraoxon. We demonstrate that this apparent discrepancy, interpreted as reversible NTE inhibition with paraoxon, is the result of spontaneous reactivation after paraoxon inhibition of a non-NTE component. Some of these esterases' sensitivity to OPs suggests that they may play a role in toxicity in low-level exposure to organophosphate compounds or have a protective effect related with spontaneous reactivation. The kinetic characterization of these components will facilitate further studies for isolation and molecular characterization.
某些有机磷化合物 (OPs) 酯的作用无法用目前公认的靶标来解释。在这项工作中,我们评估和表征了两种模型化合物:对氧磷(非神经毒性诱导剂)和米帕氟肟(神经毒性诱导剂)与鸡脑膜酯酶的相互作用(抑制、重激活和“持续抑制”),鸡脑膜是一种动物模型组织和部分,神经毒性靶酯酶 (NTE) 最初就是在这里被描述和分离出来的。区分了四个酶成分。时间进程抑制的相对敏感性因对氧磷和米帕氟肟而异。对氧磷最敏感的成分也是米帕氟肟最敏感的成分(EPα:4.4-8.3%的活性),对氧磷的 I(50)(30 分钟)为 15-43 nM,米帕氟肟为 29 nM,用对氧磷抑制后可自发重激活。对氧磷的第二敏感成分(EPβ:38.3%的活性)的 I(50)(30 分钟)为 1540 nM,对米帕氟肟几乎具有抗性。第三个成分(EPγ:38.6-47.6%的活性)对氧磷有抗性,对米帕氟肟的微摩尔浓度敏感;这个成分符合有机磷诱导迟发性神经病的靶标(NTE)的操作标准。它对米帕氟肟的 I(50)(30 分钟)为 5.3-6.6 μM。第四个成分(EPδ:9.8-10.7%的活性)对两种抑制剂都几乎具有抗性。通过连续测定去除对氧磷,发现了两种对氧磷有抗性且米帕氟肟敏感的酯酶,但根据不去除对氧磷的测定,只有一种是对氧磷有抗性且米帕氟肟敏感的。我们证明,这种明显的差异,解释为对氧磷的可逆 NTE 抑制,是对氧磷抑制后非 NTE 成分自发重激活的结果。这些酯酶对 OPs 的某些敏感性表明,它们可能在低水平接触有机磷化合物的毒性中发挥作用,或者具有与自发重激活相关的保护作用。这些成分的动力学特征将有助于进一步的分离和分子特征研究。