Suppr超能文献

腔内激光消融治疗小隐静脉曲张:穿刺部位会影响早期疗效吗?

Endovenous laser ablation in the treatment of small saphenous varicose veins: does site of access influence early outcomes?

作者信息

Samuel Nehemiah, Wallace T, Carradice D, Shahin Y, Mazari F A K, Chetter I C

机构信息

Academic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, UK.

出版信息

Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2012 May;46(4):310-4. doi: 10.1177/1538574412443316. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study was performed to evaluate the clinical and technical efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of small saphenous varicosities, particularly in relation to the site of endovenous access.

METHODS

Totally 59 patients with unilateral saphenopopliteal junction incompetence and small saphenous vein reflux underwent EVLA (810 nm, 14 W diode laser) with ambulatory phlebectomies. Small saphenous vein access was gained at the lowest site of truncal reflux. Patients were divided into 2 groups: access gained above mid-calf (AMC, n = 33) and below mid-calf (BMC, n = 26) levels. Outcomes included Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSS), Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ), patient satisfaction, complications, and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in VCSS, AVVQ, generic quality of life Short Form 36, and EuroQol scores (P < .05) up to 1 year. No differences were seen between AMC and BMC groups for complications (phlebitis: 2 [6%] and 1 [3.8%], P > .05; paresthesia: 2 [6%] and 5 [19%], P = .223) and recurrence (3 [9%] and 1 [3.8%], P = .623), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The site of access in our study does not appear to influence complications specifically neural injury or recurrence rates.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估小隐静脉静脉曲张腔内激光消融术(EVLA)的临床和技术疗效,特别是与腔内入路部位的关系。

方法

共有59例单侧隐股交界处功能不全和小隐静脉反流的患者接受了EVLA(810 nm,14 W二极管激光)联合门诊静脉切除术。在主干反流的最低部位获得小隐静脉入路。患者分为两组:小腿中部以上入路(AMC,n = 33)和小腿中部以下入路(BMC,n = 26)。观察指标包括静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS)、阿伯丁静脉曲张问卷(AVVQ)、患者满意度、并发症及复发率。

结果

两组患者在长达1年的时间里,VCSS、AVVQ、简明健康状况调查问卷(Short Form 36)和欧洲五维度健康量表(EuroQol)评分均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。AMC组和BMC组在并发症(静脉炎:2例[6%]和1例[3.8%],P > 0.05;感觉异常:2例[6%]和5例[19%],P = 0.223)和复发率(3例[9%]和1例[3.8%],P = 0.623)方面均无差异。

结论

在我们的研究中,入路部位似乎不会特别影响并发症,尤其是神经损伤或复发率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验