Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jul;126(1):16-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
Many studies have examined the impact of older age on tumor recurrence and survival after hysterectomy for patients with endometrioid carcinoma. However, there is paucity of data examining the prognostic significance of age in patients with Type II endometrial carcinoma. The study was conducted to determine the prognostic impact of age in this patient population.
In this Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study, our prospectively-maintained database of 1305 patients with endometrial cancer was reviewed. Seventy-two consecutive patients with serous and clear carcinoma 2009 FIGO stages I-II were identified with at least one year follow-up after surgical staging. Patients with mixed histology and those who received preoperative therapy were excluded. All the patients underwent surgical staging from 1989 to 2009. Their medical records were reviewed. The study cohort was divided into two groups based on their age at hysterectomy (≤ 65 vs. >65). Patient's demographics, pathologic features and treatment-related factors were compared. The impact of age on recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Following univariate analysis, multivariate modeling was done using step-wise Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the impact of age on clinical outcomes after adjusting for various clinical variables.
Median follow-up for the study cohort was 45 months (range 13-246). Fifty percent of patients received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and/or adjuvant radiation treatment (RT). Thirty-five patients were older than 65 years (49%) and 37 were ≤ 65 (51%). There were no significant differences between the two groups in regard to race (African American vs Caucasian), FIGO stage, number of lymph nodes dissected, lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI), or adjuvant therapy received. There were more clear cell histology in the younger age group (p=0.035). Patients >65 years old developed more recurrences with a 5-year RFS of 59% compared to 84% for younger patients (p=0.036). The five-year DSS was not statistically different between the two groups (68% vs. 79%, respectively with p=0.313). 5-year OS was significantly shorter in the elderly patients (58% vs. 78% with p=0.014). On multivariate analysis, the presence of LVSI, not receiving RT and age >65 were independent predictors of worse RFS (p=<0.001, 0.005, and 0.040 respectively).
In this study for surgically staged FIGO I-II patients with Type II endometrial carcinoma, age more than 65 years is a significant adverse prognostic factor for tumor recurrence.
许多研究已经探讨了年龄对子宫内膜样癌患者子宫切除术后肿瘤复发和生存的影响。然而,关于年龄在 II 型子宫内膜癌患者中的预后意义的数据很少。本研究旨在确定该患者人群中年龄的预后影响。
在这项经机构审查委员会 (IRB) 批准的研究中,我们回顾了 1305 例子宫内膜癌患者的前瞻性维护数据库。确定了 72 例连续的浆液性和透明细胞癌 2009 FIGO 分期 I-II 期患者,这些患者在手术分期后至少有一年的随访。排除了混合组织学和接受术前治疗的患者。所有患者均在 1989 年至 2009 年期间接受手术分期。对其病历进行了审查。根据子宫切除术时的年龄(≤ 65 岁与>65 岁)将研究队列分为两组。比较患者的人口统计学特征、病理特征和治疗相关因素。计算年龄对无复发生存率 (RFS)、疾病特异性生存率 (DSS) 和总生存率 (OS) 的影响。进行单因素分析后,使用逐步 Cox 比例风险分析进行多变量建模,以在调整各种临床变量后评估年龄对临床结局的影响。
研究队列的中位随访时间为 45 个月(范围 13-246)。50%的患者接受了辅助铂类化疗和/或辅助放疗 (RT)。35 例患者年龄大于 65 岁(49%),37 例患者年龄≤65 岁(51%)。两组在种族(非裔美国人与白人)、FIGO 分期、淋巴结清扫数量、脉管间隙浸润 (LVSI) 或接受的辅助治疗方面无显著差异。年轻组中透明细胞组织学更多(p=0.035)。年龄较大的患者复发更多,5 年 RFS 为 59%,而年轻患者为 84%(p=0.036)。两组 5 年 DSS 无统计学差异(分别为 68%和 79%,p=0.313)。老年患者 5 年 OS 明显缩短(58%比 78%,p=0.014)。多变量分析显示,存在 LVSI、未接受 RT 和年龄>65 是 RFS 更差的独立预测因素(p<0.001、0.005 和 0.040)。
在这项针对手术分期的 FIGO I-II 期 II 型子宫内膜癌患者的研究中,年龄超过 65 岁是肿瘤复发的显著不良预后因素。