Nishi M, Miyake H, Takeda T, Takasugi N, Hanai J, Kawai T
Department of Public Health, Sapporo Medical College, Hokkaido.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1990 Sep;20(3):268-70.
Employing 421 urine samples taken randomly from normal infants and 294 samples from infants with neuroblastoma, we investigated the application of values of vanillylmandelic acid (VMA), homovanillic acid (HVA) and square root of VMA2 + HVA2 to discriminate between patients and normal infants. The establishment of an HVA cut-off level is virtually impossible because of its low sensitivity. In contrast, VMA sensitivity is high, and that of square root of VMA2 + HVA2 is very similar to that of VMA although it includes HVA. Although VMA appears to be able to discriminate well, discrimination employing VMA alone would be dangerous because cases with normal VMA and abnormal HVA would be missed, especially in the first screening for which a mechanical discrimination is performed. Overlooking such cases can be avoided by the adoption of the function square root of VMA2 + HVA2. The present study suggests that the combined use of variables can be more effective than using them separately.
我们采用随机抽取的421份正常婴儿尿液样本和294份神经母细胞瘤婴儿尿液样本,研究了香草扁桃酸(VMA)、高香草酸(HVA)以及VMA2 + HVA2的平方根值在区分患者和正常婴儿方面的应用。由于HVA敏感性较低,实际上不可能确定其临界值水平。相比之下,VMA敏感性较高,VMA2 + HVA2的平方根值的敏感性与VMA非常相似,尽管它包含HVA。虽然VMA似乎能够很好地区分,但仅使用VMA进行区分是危险的,因为VMA正常而HVA异常的病例会被漏诊,尤其是在进行机械区分的首次筛查中。采用VMA2 + HVA2的平方根值函数可以避免忽略此类病例。本研究表明,变量的联合使用可能比单独使用更有效。