Bryant Joanne, Newman Christy E, Holt Martin, Paquette Dana M, Gray Rebecca, Canavan Peter G, Saltman Deborah C, Kippax Susan C, Kidd Michael R
The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18(2):116-22. doi: 10.1071/PY11011.
General practitioners (GPs) identify that depression can be difficult to diagnose in populations with high rates of alcohol and other drug (AOD) use. This is a particular concern with gay men who are a population known to engage in high rates of AOD use and who are vulnerable to depression. This paper uses data from 563 gay men and their GPs to describe concordance between assessments of major depression and, in particular, whether AOD use undermines concordance. Data were collected as part of a larger study of male patients and GPs at high HIV-caseload general practices in Australia. Concordance was measured by comparing patients' scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 screening tool, which is based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV criteria, and GPs' ratings of the likelihood of depression for each participant. We observed high concordance between GPs' assessments of major depression and patients' scores on the PHQ-9 (79% agreement), although our analysis also suggested that concordance was better when it related to cases in which there was no depression. The high concordance observed in our study did not appear to be undermined by gay male patients' AOD use, with the exception of frequent use of crystal methamphetamine. Here, men who reported frequent use of methamphetamine were significantly less likely to have concordant assessments (adjusted odds ratio 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8). Overall, GPs appear to identify depression among many of their gay male patients. While GPs should be aware of the potential complications presented by frequent crystal methamphetamine use, other AOD use may have less impact on the diagnosis of depression.
全科医生(GPs)发现,在酒精和其他药物(AOD)使用率较高的人群中,抑郁症可能难以诊断。这对于男同性恋者来说尤其令人担忧,因为他们是已知AOD使用率较高且易患抑郁症的人群。本文使用来自563名男同性恋者及其全科医生的数据,描述重度抑郁症评估之间的一致性,特别是AOD使用是否会破坏这种一致性。这些数据是作为对澳大利亚高HIV病例负荷全科医疗中男性患者和全科医生的一项更大规模研究的一部分收集的。通过比较患者在基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版标准的患者健康问卷-9筛查工具上的得分,以及全科医生对每位参与者患抑郁症可能性的评分来衡量一致性。我们观察到全科医生对重度抑郁症的评估与患者在PHQ-9上的得分之间具有高度一致性(79%的一致性),尽管我们的分析还表明,与不存在抑郁症的病例相关时,一致性更好。我们研究中观察到的高度一致性似乎并未因男同性恋患者的AOD使用而受到破坏,但频繁使用冰毒除外。在这里,报告频繁使用冰毒的男性进行一致性评估的可能性显著较低(调整后的优势比为0.3,95%置信区间为0.1 - 0.8)。总体而言,全科医生似乎能识别出许多男同性恋患者中的抑郁症。虽然全科医生应该意识到频繁使用冰毒可能带来的潜在并发症,但其他AOD使用对抑郁症诊断的影响可能较小。