Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40514, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2012 Jun;62(6):707-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 May 1.
Despite considerable post-cranial and cranial morphological overlap with Proconsul, Afropithecus turkanensis is distinguished from that taxon by a suite of anterior dental and gnathic characters shared in common with extant pitheciin monkeys (i.e. low crowned, robust and laterally splayed canines, procumbent incisors, prognathic premaxilla, powerful temporalis muscles, reduced or absent maxillary sinuses, and deep mandibular corpora). Pitheciins are unique among living anthropoids because their canines serve a habitual dietary function and are not strictly influenced by inter-male competition. Given the functional association between pitheciin canine morphological specializations and sclerocarp foraging, a feeding strategy where the hard pericarps of unripe fruit are mechanically deformed by the canines, it has been suggested that Afropithecus may also have used its canines in a dietary context. This is confirmed by quantitative morphometric analyses of Afropithecus canine curvature and basal dimensions demonstrating that Afropithecus and extant pitheciins (Chiropotes, Cacajao) are distinguished from all other anthropoids by pronounced and evenly distributed mesial canine crown contours as well as greater resistance to canine bending in both the mesiodistal and labiolingual axes. In addition, Afropithecus, Chiropotes and Cacajao are also shown to have significantly longer and more curved premaxillae with greater incisor procumbency that effectively isolates the incisor and canine functional complexes. These morphological similarities are a result of convergence and not a shared derived ancestry. Despite their considerable morphological overlap, it is unlikely that Afropithecus and extant pitheciin diets are identical given significant dissimilarities in their post-canine morphology, maximum angular gape and body size. Nevertheless, Afropithecus canine dietary function is unique among hominoids and may have been a key component for the expansion of hominoids into Eurasia at the end of the early Miocene.
尽管与原康修尔猿有相当大的颅后和颅部形态重叠,图尔卡纳原猴(Afropithecus turkanensis)仍通过与现存的阔鼻猴类(即低冠、粗壮且侧向张开的犬齿、倾斜的切牙、前颌骨突出、强壮的颞肌、缩小或缺失的上颌窦以及深下颌体)共有的一系列前齿和颌骨特征与之区分开来。阔鼻猴类在现存的人科动物中是独一无二的,因为它们的犬齿具有习惯性的饮食功能,不受雄性间竞争的严格影响。鉴于阔鼻猴类犬齿形态特化与坚果树皮觅食之间的功能关联,这种觅食策略是指犬齿将未成熟果实的硬果皮机械变形,有人认为图尔卡纳原猴也可能在饮食方面使用了其犬齿。这一点通过对图尔卡纳原猴犬齿曲率和基部尺寸的定量形态测量分析得到了证实,分析表明,图尔卡纳原猴与现存的阔鼻猴类(吼猴、绒毛猴)在形态上有明显的区别,其犬齿冠的近中轮廓明显且均匀分布,并且在近远中轴和唇舌轴上对犬齿弯曲的抵抗力更大。此外,图尔卡纳原猴、吼猴和绒毛猴的上颌骨也明显更长、更弯曲,切牙倾斜度更大,有效地将切牙和犬齿功能复合体隔离开来。这些形态上的相似性是趋同的结果,而不是共同的衍生祖先。尽管它们有相当大的形态重叠,但由于它们的后齿形态、最大角开口和体型存在显著差异,图尔卡纳原猴和现存阔鼻猴类的饮食不可能完全相同。然而,图尔卡纳原猴的犬齿饮食功能在人科动物中是独一无二的,可能是人科动物在早中新世末期扩展到欧亚大陆的关键因素。