Suppr超能文献

胫骨髁骨折缝线桥固定的生物力学分析。

Biomechanical analysis of suture bridge fixation for tibial eminence fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown Medical School/Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct;28(10):1533-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.020. Epub 2012 May 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To perform a biomechanical analysis of suture bridge fixation for tibial eminence fractures using PushLock anchors (Arthrex, Naples, FL) and compare it with traditional suture fixation and screw fixation.

METHODS

This study used 24 porcine knees, divided into 3 comparison fixation groups: PushLock suture bridge fixation, screw fixation, and suture fixation. Each knee was dissected of all soft tissue, leaving only the anterior cruciate ligament. A tibial eminence fracture was created with disruption of the posterior hinge, and each knee was fixed with a randomly assigned fixation technique. After fixation, each knee underwent 2 phases of biomechanical testing. The initial cyclic dynamic phase assessed the displacement change after 200 cycles (in millimeters) and initial stiffness (in Newtons per millimeter) of the fixation construct. After completion of dynamic testing, each specimen underwent a single tensile failure test load to assess ultimate failure load (in Newtons) and displacement (in millimeters) to ultimate failure.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference for the load-to-failure outcome variable among treatment groups (P = .004 by analysis of variance, 1 - β = 0.851). Mean ultimate failure load borne by the PushLock fixation group was statistically significantly higher in comparison with the screw (P = .007) and suture (P = .017) fixation groups. For the cyclical testing, the primary outcome variable of displacement change after 200 loading cycles failed to show a significant difference among the 3 groups (P = .412).

CONCLUSIONS

Suture bridge fixation with PushLock anchors is a new and effective surgical technique for the treatment of displaced tibial eminence fractures. By use of a high-bone density animal model, our results suggest that this suture bridge construct provides superior fixation with regard to ultimate failure load compared with standard screw fixation and suture fixation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The suture bridge technique provides another fixation option for displaced tibial eminence fractures with comparable, and in some instances superior, biomechanical properties to screw fixation and suture fixation.

摘要

目的

使用 PushLock 锚(Arthrex,那不勒斯,佛罗里达州)对胫骨髁骨折进行缝合桥固定的生物力学分析,并将其与传统缝合固定和螺钉固定进行比较。

方法

本研究使用 24 个猪膝关节,分为 3 个比较固定组:PushLock 缝合桥固定、螺钉固定和缝合固定。每个膝关节均解剖所有软组织,仅保留前交叉韧带。通过破坏后铰链创建胫骨髁骨折,并用随机分配的固定技术固定每个膝关节。固定后,每个膝关节进行 2 个阶段的生物力学测试。初始循环动态阶段评估固定结构在 200 个循环后的位移变化(以毫米为单位)和初始刚度(以牛顿/毫米为单位)。动态测试完成后,每个标本均进行单次拉伸失效测试负载,以评估最终失效负载(以牛顿为单位)和最终失效的位移(以毫米为单位)。

结果

治疗组之间的失效负载结果变量存在显著差异(方差分析,P =.004,1-β=0.851)。与螺钉(P =.007)和缝合(P =.017)固定组相比,PushLock 固定组的最终失效负载明显更高。对于循环测试,经过 200 次加载循环后的位移变化主要结果变量在 3 组之间没有显示出显著差异(P =.412)。

结论

使用 PushLock 锚的缝合桥固定是治疗移位胫骨髁骨折的一种新的有效手术技术。通过使用高骨密度动物模型,我们的结果表明,与标准螺钉固定和缝合固定相比,这种缝合桥结构在最终失效负载方面提供了更好的固定。

临床相关性

缝合桥技术为移位的胫骨髁骨折提供了另一种固定选择,其生物力学特性与螺钉固定和缝合固定相当,在某些情况下甚至优于螺钉固定和缝合固定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验