Suppr超能文献

在柏木(Cupressus sempervirens)加压液体萃取(PLE)过程中,吹扫时间引起的精油成分损失。

The loss of essential oil components induced by the Purge Time in the Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) procedure of Cupressus sempervirens.

机构信息

Department of Chromatographic Methods, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, pl. Maria Curie-Sklodowska 3, 20-031 Lublin, Poland.

出版信息

Talanta. 2012 May 30;94:140-5. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Mar 10.

Abstract

The influence of different Purge Times on the effectiveness of Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) of volatile oil components from cypress plant matrix (Cupressus sempervirens) was investigated, applying solvents of diverse extraction efficiencies. The obtained results show the decrease of the mass yields of essential oil components as a result of increased Purge Time. The loss of extracted components depends on the extrahent type - the greatest mass yield loss occurred in the case of non-polar solvents, whereas the smallest was found in polar extracts. Comparisons of the PLE method with Sea Sand Disruption Method (SSDM), Matrix Solid-Phase Dispersion Method (MSPD) and Steam Distillation (SD) were performed to assess the method's accuracy. Independent of the solvent and Purge Time applied in the PLE process, the total mass yield was lower than the one obtained for simple, short and relatively cheap low-temperature matrix disruption procedures - MSPD and SSDM. Thus, in the case of volatile oils analysis, the application of these methods is advisable.

摘要

研究了不同吹扫时间对不同提取效率溶剂的从柏木植物基质(Cupressus sempervirens)中加压液体萃取(PLE)挥发性油成分效果的影响。结果表明,随着吹扫时间的增加,精油成分的质量产率降低。提取成分的损失取决于提取剂的类型——非极性溶剂中损失的质量最大,而极性提取物中损失的质量最小。将 PLE 方法与海砂破坏法(SSDM)、基质固相分散法(MSPD)和水蒸气蒸馏法(SD)进行了比较,以评估该方法的准确性。无论在 PLE 过程中应用哪种溶剂和吹扫时间,总质量产率都低于简单、短时间和相对廉价的低温基质破坏程序(MSPD 和 SSDM)获得的质量产率。因此,在分析挥发性油时,建议使用这些方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验