School of Biology and Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2012 Jul;44(7):614-22. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gms040. Epub 2012 May 23.
In general, for real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), normalization strategies use a reference gene as a control and to avoid the introduction of experimental errors expression of this gene should not vary in response to changing conditions. However, the expression of many reference genes has been reported to vary considerably and, without appropriate normalization, the expression profile of a target gene can be misinterpreted. In this study, the expression levels of seven commonly used reference genes (ACT, GAPDH, 28srRNA, RPL3, α-tubulin, UBC, and TBP) were detected at different development time points and in response to treatment with 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) and with rutin. The expression stability was analyzed using geNorm and NormFinder software. Significant variations were found among normal tissues and between experimentally treated tissues. The dual spike-in strategy also revealed significant variations of the expression levels of the reference genes among normal tissues and between experimentally treated tissues. Glutathione-S-transferase sigma 1 (GSTs1), which has a high expression level in fat body and is related to the mechanism of resistance, was used as a target gene to validate the feasibility and difference of these two approaches.
一般来说,对于实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR),归一化策略使用参考基因作为对照,以避免引入实验误差,该基因的表达不应随条件的变化而变化。然而,已经有报道称许多参考基因的表达变化很大,如果没有适当的归一化,目标基因的表达谱可能会被误解。在这项研究中,在不同的发育时间点以及在 20-羟基蜕皮激素(20E)和芦丁处理下,检测了七种常用参考基因(ACT、GAPDH、28srRNA、RPL3、α-微管蛋白、UBC 和 TBP)的表达水平。使用 geNorm 和 NormFinder 软件分析了表达稳定性。在正常组织和实验处理组织之间发现了显著的差异。双内参策略也揭示了正常组织和实验处理组织之间参考基因表达水平的显著差异。谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶 sigma 1(GSTs1)在脂肪体中表达水平较高,与抗性机制有关,被用作靶基因来验证这两种方法的可行性和差异。