Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Bipolar Disord. 2012 Jun;14(4):375-410. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01023.x.
Neuroimaging is an important tool for better understanding the neurobiological underpinnings of bipolar disorder (BD). However, potential study participants are often receiving psychotropic medications which can possibly confound imaging data. To better interpret the results of neuroimaging studies in BD, it is important to understand the impact of medications on structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), functional MRI (fMRI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).
To better understand the impact of medications on imaging data, we conducted a literature review and searched MEDLINE for papers that included the key words bipolar disorder and fMRI, sMRI, or DTI. The search was limited to papers that assessed medication effects and had not been included in a previous review by Phillips et al. (Medication effects in neuroimaging studies of bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165: 313-320). This search yielded 74 sMRI studies, 46 fMRI studies, and 15 DTI studies.
Medication appeared to influence many sMRI studies, but had limited impact on fMRI and DTI findings. From the structural studies, the most robust finding (20/45 studies) was that lithium was associated with increased volumes in areas important for mood regulation, while antipsychotic agents and anticonvulsants were generally not. Regarding secondary analysis of the medication effects of fMRI and DTI studies, few showed significant effects of medication, although rigorous analyses were typically not possible when the majority of subjects were medicated. Medication effects were more frequently observed in longitudinal studies designed to assess the impact of particular medications on the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal. With a few exceptions, the observed effects were normalizing, meaning that the medicated individuals with BD were more similar than their unmedicated counterparts to healthy subjects.
The effects of psychotropic medications, when present, are predominantly normalizing and thus do not seem to provide an alternative explanation for differences in volume, white matter tracts, or BOLD signal between BD participants and healthy subjects. However, the normalizing effects of medication could obfuscate differences between BD and healthy subjects, and thus might lead to type II errors.
神经影像学是更好地理解双相情感障碍(BD)神经生物学基础的重要工具。然而,潜在的研究参与者通常正在接受可能混淆成像数据的精神药物治疗。为了更好地解释 BD 神经影像学研究的结果,了解药物对结构磁共振成像(sMRI)、功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和弥散张量成像(DTI)的影响非常重要。
为了更好地理解药物对成像数据的影响,我们进行了文献回顾,并在 MEDLINE 上搜索了包含关键词“双相情感障碍”和“fMRI”、“sMRI”或“DTI”的论文。该搜索仅限于评估药物作用且未包含在 Phillips 等人之前的综述中的论文(双相情感障碍神经影像学研究中的药物作用。美国精神病学杂志 2008;165:313-320)。这项搜索产生了 74 项 sMRI 研究、46 项 fMRI 研究和 15 项 DTI 研究。
药物似乎影响了许多 sMRI 研究,但对 fMRI 和 DTI 研究结果的影响有限。从结构研究中,最有力的发现(20/45 项研究)是锂与调节情绪的重要区域的体积增加有关,而抗精神病药物和抗惊厥药通常没有。关于 fMRI 和 DTI 研究药物作用的二次分析,很少有研究显示药物有显著影响,尽管当大多数患者接受药物治疗时,通常无法进行严格的分析。在旨在评估特定药物对血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号影响的纵向研究中,药物作用更频繁地被观察到。除了少数例外,观察到的作用是正常化的,这意味着接受药物治疗的 BD 患者比未接受药物治疗的患者更类似于健康受试者。
精神药物的影响(如果存在)主要是正常化的,因此似乎不能为 BD 参与者和健康受试者之间的体积、白质束或 BOLD 信号差异提供替代解释。然而,药物的正常化作用可能会混淆 BD 和健康受试者之间的差异,从而导致 II 型错误。