Lundin S A
Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
Swed Dent J Suppl. 1990;73:1-41.
Longevity, clinical performance and some related factors of posterior composite resin restorations were investigated through clinical follow-up and laboratory studies in vivo and in vitro. Class I and Class II restorations using two experimental posterior composite resin materials were followed clinically for a four-year period. USPHS evaluation criteria were used. Assessments of wear were also made indirectly using the Leinfelder method. Marginal leakage of bacteria (in vivo) and of dye (in vitro) were studied on modified loaded Class II composite resin restorations lined with GlumaR and LifeR. The grade of conversion (cure) of the posterior composite resin material and the colonization of bacteria at proximal tooth surfaces restored with posterior composite resins were evaluated. Seven per cent of the restorations were evaluated as failures and had to be replaced during a 4-year period. The failures were mainly due to fractures and postoperative sensitivity. The calculated occlusal wear rate was 34-40 microns/year. Occlusal loading of Class II restorations in vitro resulted in a higher frequency of restorations with marginal leakage. The marginal leakage for occlusally-loaded Class II restorations in vivo and in vitro could be reduced if dentine bonding was utilized. The grade of conversion (cure) was increased in the in vivo situation compared to the in vitro. Bacterial colonization of strepococcus mutans on the proximal surfaces of posterior composite restorations showed higher frequencies compared to that on sound tooth surfaces. From the results of these studies, it may be concluded that the tested posterior composite resin materials can be used in Class I and II restorations with a good prognosis for at least 4 years. When posterior composite resins are used as restorative for posterior teeth, the following conditions should be considered: The occlusal loading should be minimal, dentin bonding should be used, the increased risk of colonization of streptococcus mutans should be acted on and regular clinical and radiographical follow-up should be performed.
通过体内和体外的临床随访及实验室研究,对后牙复合树脂修复体的寿命、临床性能及一些相关因素进行了调查。使用两种实验性后牙复合树脂材料进行的I类和II类修复体临床随访了四年。采用美国公共卫生署(USPHS)评估标准。还使用莱因费尔德方法间接评估磨损情况。在衬有GlumaR和LifeR的改良加载II类复合树脂修复体上,研究了细菌(体内)和染料(体外)的边缘渗漏情况。评估了后牙复合树脂材料的转化(固化)程度以及后牙复合树脂修复的近中牙面细菌定植情况。在4年期间,7%的修复体被评估为失败并需要更换。失败主要是由于折断和术后敏感。计算得出的咬合磨损率为每年34 - 40微米。体外II类修复体的咬合加载导致边缘渗漏的修复体频率更高。如果使用牙本质粘结,体内和体外咬合加载的II类修复体的边缘渗漏可以减少。与体外情况相比,体内的转化(固化)程度有所提高。后牙复合修复体近中表面变形链球菌的细菌定植频率高于健康牙面。从这些研究结果可以得出结论,所测试的后牙复合树脂材料可用于I类和II类修复体,至少4年预后良好。当后牙复合树脂用作后牙修复材料时,应考虑以下条件:咬合负荷应最小化,应使用牙本质粘结,应应对变形链球菌定植风险增加的情况,并应进行定期的临床和影像学随访。