Laboratoire de Biophotonique et Pharmacologie, UMR 7213 du CNRS, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Strasbourg, 74, Route du Rhin, 67401 Illkirch Cedex, France.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012 Jul 7;14(25):8910-8. doi: 10.1039/c2cp40869d. Epub 2012 May 28.
The electronic transitions occurring in 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)-3-hydroxyflavone (DMAF) and 2-furanyl-3-hydroxychromone (FHC) were investigated using the TDDFT method in aprotic and protic solvents. The solvent effect was incorporated into the calculations via the PCM formalism. The H-bonding between solute and protic solvent was taken into account by considering a molecular complex between these molecules. To examine the effect of the H-bond on the ESIPT reaction, the absorption and emission wavelengths as well as the energies of the different states that intervene during these electronic transitions were calculated in acetonitrile, ethanol and methanol. The calculated positions of the absorption and emission wavelengths in various solvents were in excellent agreement with the experimental spectra, validating our approach. We found that in DMAF, the hydrogen bonding with protic solvents makes the ESIPT reaction energetically unfavourable, which explains the absence of the ESIPT tautomer emission in protic solvents. In contrast, the excited tautomer state of FHC remains energetically favourable in both aprotic and protic solvents. Comparing our calculations with the previously reported time-resolved fluorescence data, the ESIPT reaction of DMAF in aprotic solvents is reversible because the emitting states are energetically close, whereas in FHC, ESIPT is irreversible because the tautomer state is below the corresponding normal state. Therefore, the ESIPT reaction in DMAF is controlled by the relative energies of the excited states (thermodynamic control), while in FHC the ESIPT is controlled probably by the energetic barrier (kinetic control).
使用 TDDFT 方法在非质子和质子溶剂中研究了 4-(N,N-二甲基氨基)-3-羟基黄酮(DMAF)和 2-呋喃基-3-羟基色酮(FHC)中的电子跃迁。通过 PCM 形式将溶剂效应纳入计算中。通过考虑这些分子之间的分子复合物,考虑了溶质与质子溶剂之间的氢键。为了研究氢键对 ESIPT 反应的影响,在乙腈、乙醇和甲醇中计算了不同状态的吸收和发射波长以及能量,这些状态在这些电子跃迁过程中会发生相互转化。在各种溶剂中计算得到的吸收和发射波长的位置与实验光谱非常吻合,验证了我们的方法。我们发现,在 DMAF 中,与质子溶剂的氢键使 ESIPT 反应在能量上变得不利,这解释了在质子溶剂中不存在 ESIPT 互变异构体发射的原因。相比之下,FHC 的激发互变异构体状态在非质子和质子溶剂中仍然在能量上是有利的。将我们的计算结果与之前报道的时间分辨荧光数据进行比较,DMAF 在非质子溶剂中的 ESIPT 反应是可逆的,因为发射状态在能量上是接近的,而在 FHC 中,ESIPT 是不可逆的,因为互变异构体状态低于相应的正常状态。因此,DMAF 中的 ESIPT 反应受激发态的相对能量控制(热力学控制),而在 FHC 中,ESIPT 可能受能垒控制(动力学控制)。