Prosthodontic Private Practice, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Sep;39(9):692-703. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02314.x. Epub 2012 May 29.
The aim of this study was to apply a novel economic tool (cost satisfaction analysis) to assess the utility of fixed prosthodontics, to review its applicability, and to explore the perceived value of treatment. The cost satisfaction analysis employed the validated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ). Patients with a known prostheses outcome over 1-20 years were mailed the PSQ. Five hundred patients (50·7%) responded. Remembered satisfaction at insertion (initial costs) and current satisfaction (costs in hindsight) were reported on VAS, and the difference calculated (costs with time). Percentage and grouped responses (low, <40%; medium, 40-70%; high, > 70%) were analysed in relation to patient gender, age and willingness to have undergone the same treatment again, and in relation to prostheses age, type, complexity and outcome. Significance was set at P = 0·05. Averages were reported as means ± standard error. Satisfaction with initial costs and costs in hindsight were unrelated to patient gender and age, and prostheses age, type and complexity. Patients with a failure and those who would elect to not undergo the same treatment again were significantly less satisfied with initial costs (P = 0·021, P < 0·001) and costs in hindsight (P = 0·021, P < 0·001) than their counterparts. Patient's cost satisfaction (entire cohort) had significantly improved from 53 ± 1% at insertion to 81 ± 0·9% in hindsight (28 ± 1% improvement, P < 0·001). Patient cost satisfaction had also significantly improved, and the magnitude of improvement was the same within every individual cohort (P = 0·004 to P < 0·001), including patients with failures, and those who in hindsight would not undergo the same treatment again. Low satisfaction was reported by 166 patients initially, but 94% of these reported improvements in hindsight. Fourteen patients (3%) remained dissatisfied in hindsight, although 71% of these would still choose to undergo the same treatment again. Cost satisfaction analysis provided an evaluation of the patient's perspective of the value of fixed prosthodontic treatment. Although fixed prosthodontic treatment was perceived by patients to be expensive, it was also perceived to impart value with time. Cost satisfaction analysis provides a clinically useful insight into patient behaviour.
本研究旨在应用一种新的经济工具(成本满意度分析)来评估固定修复的效用,回顾其适用性,并探讨治疗的感知价值。成本满意度分析采用了经过验证的患者满意度问卷(PSQ)。对已知修复体结果为 1-20 年的患者邮寄 PSQ。500 名患者(50.7%)做出回应。在 VAS 上报告了植入时的记忆满意度(初始成本)和当前满意度(事后成本),并计算了差异(随时间推移的成本)。分析了患者性别、年龄、是否愿意再次接受相同治疗、修复体年龄、类型、复杂性和结果与百分比和分组反应(低,<40%;中,40-70%;高,>70%)之间的关系。显著性设定为 P=0.05。平均值报告为平均值±标准误差。初始成本和事后成本的满意度与患者性别和年龄以及修复体年龄、类型和复杂性无关。修复体失败和不愿意再次接受相同治疗的患者对初始成本(P=0.021,P<0.001)和事后成本(P=0.021,P<0.001)的满意度明显降低。整个队列的患者成本满意度(从植入时的 53±1%显著提高到事后的 81±0.9%(28±1%的改善,P<0.001)。患者成本满意度也显著提高,并且在每个单独的队列中,改善的幅度是相同的(P=0.004 至 P<0.001),包括修复体失败和事后不愿再次接受相同治疗的患者。最初有 166 名患者报告满意度低,但 94%的患者在事后报告有所改善。14 名患者(3%)在事后仍不满意,尽管其中 71%的患者仍会选择再次接受相同的治疗。成本满意度分析对患者对固定修复治疗价值的看法进行了评估。尽管固定修复治疗被患者认为是昂贵的,但它也被认为随着时间的推移会带来价值。成本满意度分析为患者行为提供了有用的临床见解。