Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088.
The role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of patients with esophageal or esophagogastric-junction cancer is not well established. We compared chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone in this patient population.
We randomly assigned patients with resectable tumors to receive surgery alone or weekly administration of carboplatin (doses titrated to achieve an area under the curve of 2 mg per milliliter per minute) and paclitaxel (50 mg per square meter of body-surface area) for 5 weeks and concurrent radiotherapy (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions, 5 days per week), followed by surgery.
From March 2004 through December 2008, we enrolled 368 patients, 366 of whom were included in the analysis: 275 (75%) had adenocarcinoma, 84 (23%) had squamous-cell carcinoma, and 7 (2%) had large-cell undifferentiated carcinoma. Of the 366 patients, 178 were randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, and 188 to surgery alone. The most common major hematologic toxic effects in the chemoradiotherapy-surgery group were leukopenia (6%) and neutropenia (2%); the most common major nonhematologic toxic effects were anorexia (5%) and fatigue (3%). Complete resection with no tumor within 1 mm of the resection margins (R0) was achieved in 92% of patients in the chemoradiotherapy-surgery group versus 69% in the surgery group (P<0.001). A pathological complete response was achieved in 47 of 161 patients (29%) who underwent resection after chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative complications were similar in the two treatment groups, and in-hospital mortality was 4% in both. Median overall survival was 49.4 months in the chemoradiotherapy-surgery group versus 24.0 months in the surgery group. Overall survival was significantly better in the chemoradiotherapy-surgery group (hazard ratio, 0.657; 95% confidence interval, 0.495 to 0.871; P=0.003).
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy improved survival among patients with potentially curable esophageal or esophagogastric-junction cancer. The regimen was associated with acceptable adverse-event rates. (Funded by the Dutch Cancer Foundation [KWF Kankerbestrijding]; Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR487.).
新辅助放化疗在治疗食管或食管胃交界部癌患者中的作用尚未明确。我们在此类患者中比较了单纯手术与放化疗后手术的疗效。
我们将可切除肿瘤患者随机分为单纯手术组或手术前接受每周卡铂(剂量滴定,以达到每毫升每分钟 2 毫克的曲线下面积)和紫杉醇(50 毫克/平方米体表面积)治疗 5 周并同时接受放疗(23 次分割,5 天/周,共 41.4 Gy),然后进行手术。
2004 年 3 月至 2008 年 12 月,我们共纳入 368 例患者,其中 366 例纳入分析:275 例(75%)为腺癌,84 例(23%)为鳞癌,7 例(2%)为大细胞未分化癌。366 例患者中,178 例随机分配至放化疗后手术组,188 例单纯手术组。放化疗后手术组最常见的主要血液学毒性反应为白细胞减少症(6%)和中性粒细胞减少症(2%);最常见的主要非血液学毒性反应为厌食(5%)和乏力(3%)。放化疗后手术组 92%的患者达到肿瘤切缘 1 毫米内无肿瘤(R0)的完全切除,而手术组为 69%(P<0.001)。161 例接受放化疗后切除的患者中,47 例达到病理完全缓解。两组术后并发症相似,院内死亡率均为 4%。放化疗后手术组中位总生存期为 49.4 个月,手术组为 24.0 个月。放化疗后手术组总生存期明显优于手术组(风险比 0.657;95%置信区间 0.495 至 0.871;P=0.003)。
术前放化疗改善了可治愈的食管或食管胃交界部癌患者的生存。该方案相关的不良事件发生率可接受。(由荷兰癌症基金会[KWF Kankerbestrijding]资助;荷兰临床试验注册中心编号:NTR487。)