Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
Am J Hypertens. 2012 Aug;25(8):862-8. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2012.64. Epub 2012 May 31.
We aimed to investigate the association of the change in the ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) with that in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) during treatment with antihypertensive medication.
We enrolled 207 hypertensive patients treated with olmesartan monotherapy for 12 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ; n = 104) or azelnidipine (n = 103) for 24 weeks. The cfPWV and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) results were assessed at baseline and 24 weeks later. The AASI was defined as 1 minus the regression slope of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) on systolic BP (SBP), and was calculated by standard and symmetric regression.
The changes in the AASI and symmetrical AASI were similar between the two groups, while cfPWV in the azelnidipine group decreased more than in the HCTZ group (P < 0.001). The change in AASI was not significantly correlated with change in cfPWV (r = 0.08, P = 0.26), whereas the change in symmetrical AASI was significantly but weakly correlated with change in cfPWV (r = 0.22, P < 0.001). The multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that the association of the change in symmetrical AASI with change in cfPWV remained significant even after adjustments for covariates derived from ABPM (regression coefficient (95% confidence interval): 1.33 (0.35-2.30), P = 0.01).
The present study demonstrated that neither AASI nor symmetrical AASI may be an unequivocal marker of arterial stiffness during antihypertensive treatment.
我们旨在研究在抗高血压药物治疗期间,动态动脉僵硬度指数(AASI)的变化与颈股脉搏波速度(cfPWV)的变化之间的关系。
我们纳入了 207 名接受奥美沙坦单药治疗 12 周的高血压患者。患者被随机分为氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ;n = 104)或阿折地平(n = 103)治疗 24 周。在基线和 24 周后评估 cfPWV 和 24 小时动态血压监测(ABPM)结果。AASI 定义为舒张压(DBP)与收缩压(SBP)的回归斜率的 1 减去值,通过标准和对称回归计算。
两组之间 AASI 和对称 AASI 的变化相似,而阿折地平组的 cfPWV 下降幅度大于 HCTZ 组(P < 0.001)。AASI 的变化与 cfPWV 的变化无显著相关性(r = 0.08,P = 0.26),而对称 AASI 的变化与 cfPWV 的变化显著但弱相关(r = 0.22,P < 0.001)。多变量线性回归分析表明,即使在调整 ABPM 得出的协变量后,对称 AASI 的变化与 cfPWV 的变化之间的关联仍然显著(回归系数(95%置信区间):1.33(0.35-2.30),P = 0.01)。
本研究表明,在抗高血压治疗期间,AASI 或对称 AASI 均可能不是动脉僵硬度的明确标志物。