Academic Department of Otorhinolaryngology, National University of Ireland Galway and Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland.
Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):1967-73. doi: 10.1002/lary.23401. Epub 2012 May 30.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To provide an in-depth evaluation of research yield in laryngeal cancer from 1945 to 2010, using large-scale data analysis, employment of bibliometric indicators of production and quality, and density equalizing mapping.
Bibliometic analysis incorporating the Web of Science Database.
The search strategy employed was as follows; "TS = ((Laryngeal Neoplasm$) OR (Larynx Neoplasm$) OR (Larynx Cancer$) OR (Laryngeal Cancer$))." Author and journal data and cooperation networks were computed following analysis of combinations of countries and institutions that registered cooperation during the study period. Mapping was performed as described by Groneberg-Kloft in 2004.
A total of 8,658 items relating to laryngeal cancer were published over the study period, accounting for 139,700 citations. The United States was the most prolific country, accounting for 28.83% (n = 2,496) of total output. Other prolific nations included Italy (n = 794) and Germany (n = 792). There were 973 items published as a consequence of international cooperation; this practice increased steadily over time and accounted for 15.58% (88 of 565) of output in 2010. There were 1,073 different journals publishing articles on laryngeal cancer, although the top 20 (1.8%) most prolific titles were together responsible for more than 43% of the total output; these were led by Laryngoscope (n = 368) and Head and Neck, Journal of the Scientific Specialties (n = 364). A total of 24,682 authors contributed to the literature on laryngeal cancer; the leading author by output was Alfio Ferlito (n = 120); Carlo La Vecchia recorded the highest h-index (h = 32).
This work represents the first attempt to provide quantitative and qualitative analysis of laryngeal cancer research output, whilst in tandem identifying the key bibliometric benchmarks to which those involved in the production of that output might aspire.
目的/假设:通过大规模数据分析、生产和质量文献计量指标的运用以及密度均衡映射,对 1945 年至 2010 年的喉癌研究成果进行深入评估。
包含 Web of Science 数据库的文献计量分析。
采用的搜索策略如下:“TS=((喉癌)或(喉肿瘤)或(喉癌))。”分析了在研究期间有合作关系的国家和机构的作者和期刊数据以及合作网络。映射是按照 Groneberg-Kloft 在 2004 年描述的方法进行的。
在研究期间共发表了 8658 篇与喉癌相关的文章,共被引用 139700 次。美国是最有成果的国家,占总产出的 28.83%(n=2496)。其他成果丰富的国家包括意大利(n=794)和德国(n=792)。有 973 项成果是国际合作的结果;这种做法随着时间的推移稳步增加,占 2010 年产出的 15.58%(88/565)。有 1073 种不同的期刊发表关于喉癌的文章,尽管排名前 20 位(1.8%)的最有影响力的期刊共同负责超过 43%的总产出;其中以喉镜(n=368)和头颈部杂志-科学专业(n=364)为首。共有 24682 名作者为喉癌文献做出了贡献;按产出计算,排名第一的作者是 Alfio Ferlito(n=120);Carlo La Vecchia 的 h 指数最高(h=32)。
这是首次尝试对喉癌研究成果进行定量和定性分析,同时确定了参与该产出的人员可能期望达到的关键文献计量基准。