Department of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012 Jun;36(3):257-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00841.x. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
To determine whether diabetic retinal screening services and retinopathy referral centres in New Zealand meet the national guidelines for referral and assessment of screen detected moderate retinal and mild macular diabetic eye disease.
Diabetic retinal screening pathways and the data collected at four main centre retinal screening services were described and compared with recommendations in the national diabetes retinal screening guidelines. A retrospective audit of photoscreen detected moderate retinopathy (grade R3), and mild maculopathy (grades M2B and M3) during May to August 2008 was undertaken. Data collected by retinopathy referral centres were used to examine the follow-up of screen detected cases and to make comparisons with the national recommendations.
All four screening services used the guidelines for grading, but the recommended dataset was incomplete. Not all recorded data were readily accessible. The retinal photos of 157 (2.4%) patients were graded as R3, M2B, M3 or a combination. The proportion of those screened with these grades varied across the four centres from 1.2% to 3.4%. Follow-up of the 157 screen positive patients did not always comply with guideline recommendations. Seventy five (48%) were referred for review by an ophthalmologist as recommended, 45 (60% of referred) were seen within the recommended six months. Nine patients (15% of the 60 with a documented assessment) were referred for or received laser treatment at 12-months follow-up.
Quality diabetic retinal screening data systems and quality assurance programs are required to improve the monitoring and quality of retinal screening in New Zealand.
确定新西兰的糖尿病视网膜筛查服务和视网膜转诊中心是否符合国家关于中度视网膜病变和轻度黄斑糖尿病眼病筛查后转诊和评估的指南。
描述了四个主要中心视网膜筛查服务的糖尿病视网膜筛查途径和收集的数据,并将其与国家糖尿病视网膜筛查指南中的建议进行了比较。对 2008 年 5 月至 8 月期间照片筛查发现的中度视网膜病变(R3 级)和轻度黄斑病变(M2B 和 M3 级)进行了回顾性审核。使用视网膜转诊中心收集的数据来检查屏幕检测病例的随访情况,并与国家建议进行比较。
所有四个筛查服务都使用了分级指南,但推荐的数据集不完整。并非所有记录的数据都易于获取。157 名(2.4%)患者的视网膜照片被评为 R3、M2B、M3 或组合。这四个中心的筛查者中,有这些等级的比例从 1.2%到 3.4%不等。对 157 名筛查阳性患者的随访并不总是符合指南建议。按照建议,75 名(48%)被转诊给眼科医生进行复查,其中 45 名(60%的转诊者)在推荐的六个月内接受了检查。在 12 个月的随访中,有 9 名患者(60 名有记录评估的患者中的 15%)被转诊或接受了激光治疗。
需要建立糖尿病视网膜筛查质量数据系统和质量保证计划,以改善新西兰视网膜筛查的监测和质量。