Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY 10010, USA.
J Prosthodont. 2012 Aug;21(6):433-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00861.x. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that all-ceramic crown core-veneer system reliability is improved by modifying the core design and as a result is comparable in reliability to metal-ceramic retainers (MCR). Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to verify maximum principal stress distribution in the systems.
A first lower molar full crown preparation was modeled by reducing the height of proximal walls by 1.5 mm and occlusal surface by 2.0 mm. The CAD-based preparation was replicated and positioned in a dental articulator for specimen fabrication. Conventional (0.5 mm uniform thickness) and modified (2.5 mm height, 1 mm thickness at the lingual extending to proximals) zirconia (Y-TZP) core designs were produced with 1.5 mm veneer porcelain. MCR controls were fabricated following conventional design. All crowns were resin cemented to 30-day aged composite dies, aged 14 days in water and either single-loaded to failure or step-stress fatigue tested. The loads were positioned either on the mesiobuccal or mesiolingual cusp (n = 21 for each ceramic system and cusp). Probability Weibull and use level probability curves were calculated. Crack evolution was followed, and postmortem specimens were analyzed and compared to clinical failures.
Compared to conventional and MCRs, increased levels of stress were observed in the core region for the modified Y-TZP core design. The reliability was higher in the Y-TZP-lingual-modified group at 100,000 cycles and 200 N, but not significantly different from the MCR-mesiolingual group. The MCR-distobuccal group showed the highest reliability. Fracture modes for Y-TZP groups were veneer chipping not exposing the core for the conventional design groups, and exposing the veneer-core interface for the modified group. MCR fractures were mostly chipping combined with metal coping exposure.
FEA showed higher levels of stress for both Y-TZP core designs and veneer layers compared to MCR. Core design modification resulted in fatigue reliability response of Y-TZP comparable to MCR at 100,000 cycles and 200 N. Fracture modes observed matched with clinical scenarios.
本研究旨在验证以下假设,即通过修改核设计可以提高全陶瓷冠核-面瓷系统的可靠性,使其与金属陶瓷保持器(MCR)的可靠性相当。采用有限元分析(FEA)验证了系统中最大主应力分布。
通过将近中壁高度降低 1.5mm 和牙合面降低 2.0mm 来模拟下颌第一磨牙全冠预备。基于 CAD 的预备体被复制并放置在牙合架上进行试件制作。采用传统(0.5mm 均匀厚度)和改良(2.5mm 高度,1mm 厚度从舌侧延伸到近中)氧化锆(Y-TZP)核设计制作 1.5mm 厚的饰面瓷。MCR 对照组采用传统设计制作。所有牙冠均用树脂水门汀黏结到 30 天老化的复合代型上,在水中老化 14 天,然后进行单加载至失效或分级应力疲劳试验。载荷放置在颊侧或舌侧近中尖上(每个陶瓷系统和尖各 21 个)。计算概率威布尔和使用水平概率曲线。观察裂纹演变,并对尸检样本进行分析,与临床失效进行比较。
与传统和 MCR 相比,改良 Y-TZP 核设计的核区域观察到更高水平的应力。在 100000 次循环和 200N 时,Y-TZP-舌侧改良组的可靠性更高,但与 MCR-舌侧组无显著差异。MCR-远颊侧组的可靠性最高。Y-TZP 组的断裂模式是饰面瓷崩瓷而不暴露核,改良组则暴露饰面-核界面。MCR 断裂大多是崩瓷与金属覆盖层暴露相结合。
FEA 显示,与 MCR 相比,两种 Y-TZP 核设计和饰面瓷层的应力水平都更高。核设计的修改使得 Y-TZP 的疲劳可靠性反应与 MCR 在 100000 次循环和 200N 时相当。观察到的断裂模式与临床情况相符。