• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正选择在果蝇蛋白保守片段进化中的主要作用。

Major role of positive selection in the evolution of conservative segments of Drosophila proteins.

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Vorbyevy Gory 1-73, Moscow 119992, Russia.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Sep 7;279(1742):3409-17. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0776. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2012.0776
PMID:22673359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3396909/
Abstract

Slow evolution of conservative segments of coding and non-coding DNA is caused by the action of negative selection, which removes new mutations. However, the mode of selection that affects the few substitutions that do occur within such segments remains unclear. Here, we show that the fraction of allele replacements that were driven by positive selection, and the strength of this selection, is the highest within the conservative segments of Drosophila protein-coding genes. The McDonald-Kreitman test, applied to the data on variation in Drosophila melanogaster and in Drosophila simulans, indicates that within the most conservative protein segments, approximately 72 per cent (approx. 80%) of allele replacements were driven by positive selection, as opposed to only approximately 44 per cent (approx. 53%) at rapidly evolving segments. Data on multiple non-synonymous substitutions at a codon lead to the same conclusion and additionally indicate that positive selection driving allele replacements at conservative sites is the strongest, as it accelerates evolution by a factor of approximately 40, as opposed to a factor of approximately 5 at rapidly evolving sites. Thus, random drift plays only a minor role in the evolution of conservative DNA segments, and those relatively rare allele replacements that occur within such segments are mostly driven by substantial positive selection.

摘要

保守编码和非编码 DNA 片段的缓慢进化是由负选择作用引起的,负选择会剔除新的突变。然而,影响这些片段内少数替代的选择模式仍不清楚。在这里,我们表明,正选择驱动的等位基因替换的分数,以及这种选择的强度,在果蝇蛋白编码基因的保守片段中最高。麦科德-克里坦测试(McDonald-Kreitman test)应用于黑腹果蝇和拟果蝇的变异数据表明,在最保守的蛋白质片段中,大约 72%(约 80%)的等位基因替换是由正选择驱动的,而在快速进化的片段中,这一比例仅约为 44%(约 53%)。一个密码子上多个非同义替换的数据也得出了相同的结论,并进一步表明,正选择驱动保守位点的等位基因替换最强,因为它通过大约 40 倍的因子加速了进化,而在快速进化的位点则通过大约 5 倍的因子加速了进化。因此,随机漂变在保守 DNA 片段的进化中只起很小的作用,而且这些在保守片段中发生的相对罕见的等位基因替换主要是由实质性的正选择驱动的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ec/3396909/7b1c1265245c/rspb20120776-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ec/3396909/d3fb944132f7/rspb20120776-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ec/3396909/a3b7e34d084f/rspb20120776-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ec/3396909/7b1c1265245c/rspb20120776-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ec/3396909/d3fb944132f7/rspb20120776-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ec/3396909/a3b7e34d084f/rspb20120776-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ec/3396909/7b1c1265245c/rspb20120776-g3.jpg

相似文献

1
Major role of positive selection in the evolution of conservative segments of Drosophila proteins.正选择在果蝇蛋白保守片段进化中的主要作用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Sep 7;279(1742):3409-17. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0776. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
2
Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.果蝇基因组中反复出现的有益氨基酸替换的搭便车效应。
Genome Res. 2007 Dec;17(12):1755-62. doi: 10.1101/gr.6691007. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
3
Detecting past positive selection through ongoing negative selection.通过持续的负选择来检测过去的正选择。
Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:1006-13. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr086. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
4
The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila.果蝇中适应性氨基酸替换的基因组速率。
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jul;21(7):1350-60. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh134. Epub 2004 Mar 24.
5
Pervasive adaptive protein evolution apparent in diversity patterns around amino acid substitutions in Drosophila simulans.在黑腹果蝇模拟种的氨基酸替换周围的多样性模式中,普遍存在适应性蛋白质进化。
PLoS Genet. 2011 Feb 10;7(2):e1001302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001302.
6
A screen for immunity genes evolving under positive selection in Drosophila.对果蝇中在正选择作用下进化的免疫基因的筛选。
J Evol Biol. 2007 May;20(3):965-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01305.x.
7
The evolution of small insertions and deletions in the coding genes of Drosophila melanogaster.果蝇编码基因中小段插入和缺失的进化。
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Dec;30(12):2699-708. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst167. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
8
Differential strengths of positive selection revealed by hitchhiking effects at small physical scales in Drosophila melanogaster.黑腹果蝇小物理尺度上搭便车效应揭示的正向选择差异强度
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Apr;31(4):804-16. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst270. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
9
Adaptive evolution and the birth of CTCF binding sites in the Drosophila genome.果蝇基因组中 CTCF 结合位点的适应性进化。
PLoS Biol. 2012;10(11):e1001420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001420. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
10
Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster.黑腹果蝇和拟暗果蝇之间的分子进化:黑腹果蝇中密码子偏好性降低、氨基酸替换速率加快以及蛋白质更大
Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1297-307. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1297.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular Evolution of the Bactericidal/Permeability-Increasing Protein (BPIFA1) Regulating the Innate Immune Responses in Mammals.杀菌/通透性增加蛋白(BPIFA1)在哺乳动物固有免疫反应中的分子进化调控
Genes (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;14(1):15. doi: 10.3390/genes14010015.
2
Genetics of Adaptation of the Ascomycetous Fungus Podospora anserina to Submerged Cultivation.子囊菌真菌 Podospora anserina 适应浸没培养的遗传学研究。
Genome Biol Evol. 2019 Oct 1;11(10):2807-2817. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz194.
3
Searching for Signatures of Cold Climate Adaptation in Gene in Populations of East Asian Ancestry.

本文引用的文献

1
The Divergence of Species-Specific Abalone Sperm Lysins is Promoted by Positive Darwinian Selection.物种特异性鲍鱼精子溶素的分化是由正向达尔文选择推动的。
Biol Bull. 1992 Feb;182(1):97-104. doi: 10.2307/1542183.
2
The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel.黑腹果蝇遗传参考面板。
Nature. 2012 Feb 8;482(7384):173-8. doi: 10.1038/nature10811.
3
Positive and negative selection in murine ultraconserved noncoding elements.鼠类超保守非编码元件中的正选择和负选择。
探寻东亚人群中与寒冷气候适应相关基因的特征。
Front Genet. 2019 Aug 23;10:759. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00759. eCollection 2019.
4
Estimating the parameters of background selection and selective sweeps in in the presence of gene conversion.在存在基因转换的情况下,估计背景选择和选择清扫的参数。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 13;114(24):E4762-E4771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619434114. Epub 2017 May 30.
5
Compensatory Evolution of Intrinsic Transcription Terminators in Bacillus Cereus.蜡样芽孢杆菌中内在转录终止子的补偿性进化
Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Feb 1;9(2):340-349. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw295.
6
Accelerated pathway evolution in mouse-like rodents involves cell cycle control.类鼠啮齿动物的加速通路进化涉及细胞周期调控。
Mamm Genome. 2015 Dec;26(11-12):609-18. doi: 10.1007/s00335-015-9605-8. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
7
Patterns of positive selection in seven ant genomes.七个蚂蚁基因组中的正选择模式。
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Jul;31(7):1661-85. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu141. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
8
Prevalence of multinucleotide replacements in evolution of primates and Drosophila.灵长类动物和果蝇进化中的多核苷酸替换的流行率。
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Jun;30(6):1315-25. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst036. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Sep;28(9):2651-60. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr093. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
4
High sensitivity to aligner and high rate of false positives in the estimates of positive selection in the 12 Drosophila genomes.在 12 个果蝇基因组中,对调整器的高度敏感和对正选择估计的高假阳性率。
Genome Res. 2011 Jun;21(6):863-74. doi: 10.1101/gr.115949.110. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
5
Correlated evolution of nearby residues in Drosophilid proteins.果蝇蛋白中临近残基的相关性进化。
PLoS Genet. 2011 Feb;7(2):e1001315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001315. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
6
Effective population size and the efficacy of selection on the X chromosomes of two closely related Drosophila species.有效种群大小和选择对两个密切相关的果蝇物种 X 染色体的效力。
Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:114-28. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evq086. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
7
Positive and negative selection on noncoding DNA close to protein-coding genes in wild house mice.野生小家鼠中蛋白编码基因附近非编码 DNA 的正选择和负选择。
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Mar;28(3):1183-91. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq299. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
8
Estimating the parameters of selection on nonsynonymous mutations in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. miranda.估计果蝇拟暗和 D. miranda 非同义突变选择的参数。
Genetics. 2010 Aug;185(4):1381-96. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.117614. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
9
Estimates of positive Darwinian selection are inflated by errors in sequencing, annotation, and alignment.估计正达尔文选择受到测序、注释和比对错误的影响而膨胀。
Genome Biol Evol. 2009 Jun 5;1:114-8. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evp012.
10
Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species.全基因组分析揭示,许多植物物种的适应性进化证据很少。
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Aug;27(8):1822-32. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq079. Epub 2010 Mar 18.