Doctoral Degree Program in Marine Biotechnology, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2012 Jul 30;26(14):1609-16. doi: 10.1002/rcm.6263.
Conventional studies of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) typically require elaborate separation procedures or complicated sample pretreatment processes such as purification by dialysis and lyophilization. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the use of electrospray ionization (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry (MS) as powerful techniques for direct analysis of EPS secreted by E. coli.
We have compared the extraction efficiency of two widely used extraction methods including physical extraction (room-temperature centrifugation and high-speed centrifugation) and chemical extraction using EDTA and formaldehyde. We specify the most favorable extraction method and the analyte to extractant concentration with respect to mass spectrometric analysis of EPS, based on the results obtained from ESI-MS and MALDI-MS analysis.
Chemical extraction methods were found to be more efficient than physical extraction methods. Of the chemical extractants, EDTA was found more effective compared to formaldehyde and gave more EPS peaks during ESI- and MALDI-MS analysis. We report the classification of E. coli EPS into loosely bound, bound and tightly bound EPS based on a simple modification of an existing methodology. Our studies showed that ESI-MS was very effective for <300 Da EPS studies and MALDI-MS more suitable for rapid analysis of EPS above mass range 400 Da.
This is a preliminary study reporting for the first time the feasibility of ESI-MS and MALDI-MS techniques for the analysis of bacterial EPS without prior complicated purification and separation methodologies.
传统的细胞外聚合物(EPS)研究通常需要复杂的分离程序或复杂的样品预处理过程,例如通过透析和冻干进行纯化。本研究的目的是展示电喷雾电离(ESI)和基质辅助激光解吸/电离(MALDI)质谱(MS)作为直接分析大肠杆菌分泌的 EPS 的强大技术。
我们比较了两种广泛使用的提取方法的提取效率,包括物理提取(室温离心和高速离心)和使用 EDTA 和甲醛的化学提取。我们根据 ESI-MS 和 MALDI-MS 分析的结果,指定了最有利的提取方法和分析物与提取剂的浓度,以进行 EPS 的质谱分析。
化学提取方法比物理提取方法更有效。在化学提取剂中,与甲醛相比,EDTA 更有效,并且在 ESI 和 MALDI-MS 分析中产生更多的 EPS 峰。我们根据现有方法的简单修改,将大肠杆菌 EPS 分类为松散结合、结合和紧密结合的 EPS。我们的研究表明,ESI-MS 非常适合研究<300 Da 的 EPS,而 MALDI-MS 更适合快速分析质量范围为 400 Da 以上的 EPS。
这是一项初步研究,首次报道了在没有先前复杂的纯化和分离方法的情况下,ESI-MS 和 MALDI-MS 技术分析细菌 EPS 的可行性。