Gheorghiu Elena, Kingdom Frederick A A
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Vis. 2012 Jun 15;12(6):20. doi: 10.1167/12.6.20.
Evidence that contour-shapes and texture-shapes are processed by different mechanisms included the finding that contour-shape aftereffects are reduced when the adaptation stimulus is a texture made of contours rather than a single contour. This phenomenon has been termed texture-surround suppression of contour-shape, or TSSCS. How does TSSCS operate and over what spatial extent? We measured the postadaptation shift in the apparent shape frequency of a single sinusoidal-shaped contour as a function of the number of contours in the adaptor stimulus. Contours were Gabor strings in which the Gabor orientations were either tangential (snakes) or orthogonal (ladders) to the path of the contour. We found that for extended surrounds, the aftereffect was strongly reduced when the surround contours were the same as the central adaptor contour, but not when the Gabors making up the surround contours were opposite-in-orientation to those of the central adaptor. For near surrounds, the aftereffect in a snake contour was unaffected by same-orientation but strongly suppressed by opposite-orientation surrounds, whereas the aftereffect for a ladder-contour was suppressed equally by both same- and opposite-orientation near surrounds. Finally, the strength of surround suppression decreased gradually with increasing spatial separation between center and surround. These results indicate that there are two components to texture-surround suppression in our shape aftereffect: one that is sensitive to opposite-orientation texture surrounds, operates locally, and disrupts contour-processing; the other that is sensitive to same-orientation texture surrounds, is spatially extended, and prevents the shape of the contour from being processed as a contour. We also demonstrate that the observed shape aftereffects are not due to changes in the apparent shape-frequency of the adaptors or the precision with which their shape-frequency is encoded, indicating that TSSCS is not an instance of crowding.
当适应刺激是由轮廓组成的纹理而非单个轮廓时,轮廓形状后效会减弱。这种现象被称为轮廓形状的纹理环绕抑制,即TSSCS。TSSCS是如何运作的,其空间范围是多大?我们测量了单个正弦形轮廓的表观形状频率在适应后的偏移,该偏移是适应刺激中轮廓数量的函数。轮廓是Gabor串,其中Gabor方向与轮廓路径相切(蛇形)或正交(梯形)。我们发现,对于扩展的环绕,当环绕轮廓与中央适应轮廓相同时,后效会大幅减弱,但当组成环绕轮廓的Gabor与中央适应轮廓的方向相反时则不会。对于近距离环绕,蛇形轮廓中的后效不受相同方向的影响,但会被相反方向的环绕强烈抑制,而梯形轮廓的后效则会被相同和相反方向的近距离环绕同等程度地抑制。最后,环绕抑制的强度随着中心和环绕之间空间距离的增加而逐渐降低。这些结果表明,在我们的形状后效中,纹理环绕抑制有两个组成部分:一个对相反方向的纹理环绕敏感,在局部起作用,并干扰轮廓处理;另一个对相同方向的纹理环绕敏感,在空间上扩展,并阻止轮廓形状被作为轮廓进行处理。我们还证明,观察到的形状后效不是由于适应刺激的表观形状频率变化或其形状频率编码的精度变化导致的,这表明TSSCS不是拥挤的一个实例。