Aaserud O, Juntunen J, Matikainen E
Department of Neurology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Acta Neurol Scand. 1990 Oct;82(4):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1990.tb01619.x.
Vibration sensitivity thresholds were studied in 12 healthy volunteers using 25, 50, 100 and 250 s-1 stimulus frequencies from an instrument with automated and manual modes ('Vibra Mk II'). For the automated mode, a forced choice principle was adopted. All measurements were performed from both the knuckle of the IInd metacarpophalangeal joint and the medial malleolus on four successive days. In addition, a conventional tuning fork method for vibration sensitivity was applied. The results show high interindividual and intraindividual variation in all measurements. The threshold values measured by the automated system were significantly lower than those by manual system at all frequencies. The largest variation was seen at 250 s-1 and the most uniform values at 100 s-1. There was a clear difference between the values from knuckle and medial malleolus, the values in the foot being lower. There was no learning effect. Clear age-related increase in vibration thresholds was observed. Conventional tuning fork-method showed clear differences in vibration sensitivity between hand and foot, in accordance with computer assisted method. The higher sensitivity of the automated method compared to the manual makes this the method of choice, although further investigations to finish the method and to build up a broader reference material is desirable.
使用具有自动和手动模式的仪器(“Vibra Mk II”),以25、50、100和250 s-1的刺激频率,对12名健康志愿者的振动敏感性阈值进行了研究。对于自动模式,采用了强制选择原则。所有测量均在连续四天内从第二掌指关节的指节和内踝进行。此外,还应用了传统的音叉振动敏感性方法。结果表明,所有测量中个体间和个体内的差异都很大。在所有频率下,自动系统测量的阈值均显著低于手动系统测量的阈值。在250 s-1时变化最大,在100 s-1时最均匀。指节和内踝的值存在明显差异,足部的值较低。没有学习效应。观察到振动阈值随年龄明显增加。传统音叉法显示手和脚之间的振动敏感性存在明显差异,这与计算机辅助方法一致。与手动方法相比,自动方法具有更高的灵敏度,这使其成为首选方法,尽管需要进一步研究以完善该方法并建立更广泛的参考材料。