Department of Economics, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Apr;8(2):209-24. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000138. Epub 2012 May 1.
Ireland's private health insurance market operates on the basis of community rating, alongside open enrolment and lifetime cover. A risk equalisation scheme was introduced in 2003 to bolster community rating. However, in July 2008 the Irish Supreme Court set aside this scheme, on the basis of the interpretation of community rating in Irish legislation. This decision has significant implications for the Irish private health insurance market. This paper reviews the development of the market, focusing in particular on community rating. The breakdown of community rating in a market with multiple insurers with differing risk profiles is discussed. Applying this to the Irish market, it can be seen that the Irish Supreme Court judgment has significant implications for the application of community rating. Specifically, while community rating operates within plans, it no longer operates across the market, leading to high-risk lives paying more, on average, than low-risk lives. It has also led to greater opportunities for insurers to engage in market segmentation. This may have relevance for the design and operation of other community rated markets.
爱尔兰的私人医疗保险市场基于群体评级、开放式注册和终身保险运营。2003 年引入了风险均衡计划,以加强群体评级。然而,2008 年 7 月,爱尔兰最高法院基于爱尔兰立法中对群体评级的解释,否决了该计划。这一决定对爱尔兰私人医疗保险市场产生了重大影响。本文回顾了市场的发展,特别关注群体评级。讨论了在具有不同风险状况的多个保险公司的市场中群体评级的崩溃。将其应用于爱尔兰市场,可以看出爱尔兰最高法院的判决对群体评级的应用有重大影响。具体而言,虽然群体评级在计划内运作,但它不再在整个市场运作,导致高风险人群的平均保费高于低风险人群。这也为保险公司提供了更多的市场细分机会。这可能与其他群体评级市场的设计和运作有关。