Suppr超能文献

首先,不造成伤害:更少的培训≠高质量的护理。

First, do no harm: less training ≠ quality care.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2012 Jul;21(4):227-30. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012825. Epub 2012 Jun 20.

Abstract

In an attempt to transform the health care system in the United States to improve upon the inadequacies and deficiencies of our current model, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Institute of Medicine created a collaborative partnership to spell out what aspects of our health care system need to be remodeled. They envisioned that "interprofessional collaboration and coordination would be the 'norm,'"(1) because no discipline functions in isolation of others, certainly not in our intensive care units. In this spirit of interdisciplinary collaboration, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN)-physician and nursing societies, respectively, with combined memberships totaling more than 110 000 practicing critical care practitioners-have spoken with one voice in the editorial that follows about how and how not to address the shortage of critical care physicians. Because our critical care nurses work side by side with our intensivists, shouldn't they have a say in how intensivists are trained? The ACCP and AACN think so, and we agree. Richard S. Irwin, MD, Master FCCP Editor in Chief, CHEST.

摘要

为了改革美国的医疗体系,改善当前模式的不足和缺陷,罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会和美国国家科学院医学研究所创建了一个合作关系,以阐明我们的医疗体系需要进行哪些方面的改革。他们设想,“跨专业的协作和协调将成为‘常态’,”(1) 因为没有任何一个学科是孤立存在的,在我们的重症监护病房尤其如此。本着跨学科合作的精神,美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)和美国危重病护理协会(AACN)-分别是医生和护理协会,会员总数超过 110000 名从事重症监护的从业者-在接下来的社论中以一种声音谈到了如何以及如何解决重症监护医生短缺的问题。因为我们的重症监护护士与我们的重症监护医生并肩工作,他们不应该对重症监护医生的培训方式有发言权吗?ACCP 和 AACN 认为应该如此,我们也同意。理查德·S·欧文医学博士,FCCP 名誉主编, CHEST。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验