Department of Graduate Psychology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA.
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(4):551-62. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.690522. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
This study investigated cultural variations in perceived control over personal goals in Russian and American college students. Several appraisal dimensions of personal goals were studied including goals' importance, their attainability, and sources of control over goal attainment, such as self, others, luck, and fate. The association between assimilative (tenacious goal pursuit) and accommodative (flexible goal adjustment) control strategies and perceived attainability of goals was also examined. The results indicated that both Russian and American students gave higher priority to work- and education-related goals and lower priority to the familial goal. In both samples, the familial goal was the most influenced and health was the least influenced by luck/chance and fate. Overall, American students were more optimistic about the perceived probability to attain their goals, which may be affected by a cultural tendency for self-enhancement and positive outlook. Russian students had a stronger belief in control by luck/chance and fate over personal goals, which coincides with a less agentic orientation of Russian culture. Regardless of culture and goal content, goal importance was associated with greater perceived success in goal attainment. However, control strategies (assimilative and accommodative) as well as internal control differentially predicted perceived attainability of goals depending on the goals' content. For both Russians and Americans, perceived attainability of education-related goals was associated with assimilative strategies and internal control; leisure was associated with accommodative strategies and health-related goals were associated with internal control. Characteristics of cultural contexts accountable for crosscultural differences in perceived control over personal goals are discussed.
本研究调查了俄罗斯和美国大学生在个人目标感知控制方面的文化差异。研究了个人目标的几个评价维度,包括目标的重要性、可实现性以及目标实现的控制源,如自我、他人、运气和命运。还研究了同化(坚定的目标追求)和顺应(灵活的目标调整)控制策略与目标可实现性之间的关系。结果表明,俄罗斯和美国学生都更重视与工作和教育相关的目标,而对家庭目标的重视程度较低。在两个样本中,家庭目标最受运气/机会和命运的影响,而健康受影响最小。总的来说,美国学生对实现目标的可能性更为乐观,这可能受到自我提升和积极展望的文化倾向的影响。俄罗斯学生对运气/机会和命运对个人目标的控制有更强的信念,这与俄罗斯文化的非代理取向一致。无论文化和目标内容如何,目标的重要性都与目标实现的感知成功率相关。然而,控制策略(同化和顺应)以及内部控制根据目标内容不同地预测目标的可实现性。对于俄罗斯人和美国人来说,与教育相关的目标的可实现性与同化策略和内部控制有关;休闲与顺应策略有关,而与健康相关的目标与内部控制有关。讨论了文化背景的特点,这些特点解释了个人目标感知控制方面的跨文化差异。