Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2):221-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10800.x. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
Study Type - Therapy (case series). Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Previously, rates of potency preservation with or without external beam radiation and/ or hormone therapy have been published with smaller series and limited follow-up. The study provides greater numbers and longer follow-up giving patients and clinicians a better appreciation of the true potency preservation rates in this population and how various factors such as age, hormone use and external beam affect those rates.
• To assess potency preservation in men following brachytherapy for prostate cancer with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). • To evaluate the factors that significantly impact this rate.
• In all, 1063 potent men with T1-T3 prostate cancer were treated from 1990 to 2007 with seed implantation alone ((103) Pd or (125) I) (69.6%) or combined modality treatment consisting of a partial dose (103) Pd implant followed 6-8 weeks later by EBRT (45 Gy, prostate/seminal vesicles only) (30.4%). ADT was used in 49.1% of cases (range 1-27 months). • Patients were required to have a minimum of 2 years follow-up and to be off ADT for a minimum of 1 year. • Erectile function was assessed prior to seed implantation and at each follow-up visit using the physician-assigned Mount Sinai Erectile Function Score (MSEFS): 0, unable to have erections; 1, erections insufficient for intercourse; 2, suboptimal erections but sufficient for intercourse; 3, normal erectile function. Potent was defined as a score of greater than or equal to 2 with or without use of a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. • The potency rate was calculated using actuarial methods with comparisons tested by log-rank and Cox regression analysis.
• The 5-year and 10-year actuarial rate of potency preservation was 68.0% and 57.9%, respectively, at last follow-up. • On multivariate analysis, 5- and 10-year potency was 87.6% (79.5%) for men younger than 60, 68.0% (57.5%) for age 60-70, and 42.2% (31.0%) for men older than 70 (P < 0.001). • Pretreatment MSEFS of 2 had a potency rate of 51.7% (37.2%) vs 74.2% (65.2%) for an MSEFS of 3 (P < 0.001). • There was a 75.8% (62.6%) potency rate without ADT vs 60.0% (53.0%) with ADT (P < 0.001). • Five-year potency was 76.4% for implant alone, 71.0% for implant with EBRT, 62.2% for implant with ADT, and 57.9% for implant with EBRT and ADT (P < 0.001).
• Increasing initial age at implant, diminished pretreatment erectile function and the use of combination therapy with EBRT and/or ADT significantly increases erectile dysfunction following brachytherapy.
评估前列腺癌患者接受单纯放射性粒子植入术(103)Pd 或(125)I(69.6%)或联合局部剂量放射性粒子植入术(103)Pd 后加外照射(EBRT)(45Gy,前列腺/精囊)(30.4%)治疗后,保留勃起功能的情况,并分析影响勃起功能的相关因素。
1990 年至 2007 年,共 1063 例 T1-T3 期前列腺癌患者接受了治疗,其中单纯放射性粒子植入术 69.6%,联合局部剂量放射性粒子植入术加 EBRT 治疗 30.4%。49.1%(范围 1-27 个月)的患者接受了雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)。患者需至少随访 2 年,且停止 ADT 至少 1 年。在放射性粒子植入术前和每次随访时,通过医生评估密西根大学勃起功能评分(MSEFS)评估勃起功能:0 分,无法勃起;1 分,勃起不足以进行性交;2 分,勃起效果欠佳,但足以进行性交;3 分,勃起功能正常。有或无磷酸二酯酶 5 抑制剂治疗时,勃起功能正常定义为评分≥2 分。采用累积生存分析法计算勃起功能保留率,采用对数秩检验和 Cox 回归分析比较。
末次随访时,5 年和 10 年勃起功能保留率分别为 68.0%和 57.9%。多变量分析显示,年龄<60 岁、60-70 岁和>70 岁患者的 5 年和 10 年勃起功能保留率分别为 87.6%(79.5%)、68.0%(57.5%)和 42.2%(31.0%)(P<0.001)。术前 MSEFS 评分为 2 分患者的勃起功能保留率为 51.7%(37.2%),MSEFS 评分为 3 分患者的勃起功能保留率为 74.2%(65.2%)(P<0.001)。未接受 ADT 治疗患者的勃起功能保留率为 75.8%(62.6%),接受 ADT 治疗患者的勃起功能保留率为 60.0%(53.0%)(P<0.001)。单纯放射性粒子植入术、放射性粒子植入术联合 EBRT、放射性粒子植入术联合 ADT 及放射性粒子植入术联合 EBRT 和 ADT 治疗的 5 年勃起功能保留率分别为 76.4%、71.0%、62.2%和 57.9%(P<0.001)。
初始植入年龄增加、术前勃起功能降低和联合 EBRT 和/或 ADT 治疗均显著增加了前列腺癌患者接受放射性粒子植入术后勃起功能障碍的发生风险。