Suppr超能文献

种族和民族差异在预先护理计划中:确定亚组模式和障碍。

Racial and ethnic differences in advance care planning: identifying subgroup patterns and obstacles.

机构信息

Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Health. 2012 Sep;24(6):923-47. doi: 10.1177/0898264312449185. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The author investigated (a) whether Whites, Blacks, Latinos, and Asians differ in their rates of advance care planning (ACP; that is, living will, health care proxies, discussions), (b) sources of within-racial group heterogeneity, and (c) racial differences in the explanations offered for not doing ACP.

METHODS

The author estimated logistic regression models with data from a national sample of married and cohabiting adults ages 18 to 64 in the Knowledge Networks study (N = 2,111).

RESULTS

Latinos are less likely than Whites to discuss preferences and to have a living will, although the latter gap is fully accounted for by education. Asians are less likely than Whites to have discussions, but more likely to have living wills. Black-White differences emerge only among low SES (socioeconomic status) subgroups. Each group noted distinctive obstacles to planning.

DISCUSSION

Public policies should target increasing rates of ACP for all adults prior to onset of major health concerns.

摘要

目的

作者研究了(a)白人、黑人、拉丁裔和亚裔在预先医疗护理计划(即生前预嘱、医疗代理人、讨论)方面的进展率是否存在差异,(b)造成同一种族群体内部异质性的原因,以及(c)在不进行 ACP 方面的解释存在的种族差异。

方法

作者使用知识网络研究中年龄在 18 至 64 岁的已婚和同居成年人的全国性样本数据(N=2111),估计了逻辑回归模型。

结果

与白人相比,拉丁裔人不太可能讨论偏好,也不太可能拥有生前预嘱,尽管这种差异完全可以用教育程度来解释。与白人相比,亚洲人不太可能进行讨论,但更有可能拥有生前预嘱。只有在低 SES(社会经济地位)亚组中才会出现黑人和白人之间的差异。每个群体都指出了规划方面的独特障碍。

讨论

公共政策应该针对所有成年人,在出现重大健康问题之前,提高 ACP 的普及率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验