• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病,重点是直肠癌:荟萃分析。

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov;19(12):3727-36. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2429-9. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-012-2429-9
PMID:22752371
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic colorectal surgery may solve some of the problems inherent to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). We sought to evaluate the advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) using the da Vinci Surgical System over CLS in patients with benign and malignant colorectal diseases.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies published before July 2011. Studies clearly documenting a comparison of RALS with CLS for benign and malignant colorectal diseases were selected. Operative and postoperative measures, resection margins, complications, and related outcomes were evaluated. Weighted mean differences, relative risks, and hazard ratios were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 16 studies comparing RALS and CLS in patients with colorectal diseases and 7 studies in rectal cancer. RALS was associated with lower estimated blood loss in colorectal diseases (P = 0.04) and rectal cancer (P < 0.001) and lower rates of intraoperative conversion in colorectal diseases (P = 0.03) and rectal cancer (P < 0.001) than CLS. In patients with colorectal diseases, however, operating time (P < 0.001) and total hospitalization cost (P = 0.06) were higher for RALS than for CLS.

CONCLUSIONS

RALS was associated with reduced estimated blood loss and a lower intraoperative conversion rate than CLS, with no differences in complication rates and surrogate markers of successful surgery. Robotic colorectal surgery is a promising tool, especially for patients with rectal cancer.

摘要

背景

机器人结直肠手术可能解决一些传统腹腔镜手术(CLS)固有的问题。我们试图评估达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助腹腔镜手术(RALS)相对于 CLS 在治疗结直肠良恶性疾病方面的优势。

方法

检索 2011 年 7 月前发表的有关 RALS 与 CLS 比较的研究,纳入明确比较 RALS 与 CLS 治疗结直肠良恶性疾病的研究。评估手术和术后措施、切缘、并发症和相关结局。采用随机效应模型计算加权均数差、相对风险和危险比。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了 16 项 RALS 与 CLS 治疗结直肠疾病的比较研究和 7 项直肠癌研究。与 CLS 相比,RALS 治疗结直肠疾病(P=0.04)和直肠癌(P<0.001)术中出血量更少,且术中中转开腹率更低(P=0.03 和 P<0.001)。但在结直肠疾病患者中,RALS 的手术时间(P<0.001)和总住院费用(P=0.06)更高。

结论

与 CLS 相比,RALS 可减少估计失血量和降低术中中转开腹率,且并发症发生率和手术成功的替代标志物无差异。机器人结直肠手术是一种有前途的工具,特别是对于直肠癌患者。

相似文献

1
Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病,重点是直肠癌:荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov;19(12):3727-36. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2429-9. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术治疗直肠癌的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jul;19(7):2095-101. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2270-1. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
3
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗低位直肠癌:内脏肥胖对手术结果的影响
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Oct;31(10):1701-10. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2653-z. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
4
Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:单中心短期疗效
Surg Today. 2016 Aug;46(8):957-62. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1266-4. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Surg Res. 2014 May 15;188(2):404-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
6
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.新辅助放化疗后机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):959-969. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01498-3. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
7
A Comparative Study of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.单孔腹腔镜手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的对比研究
Surg Innov. 2015 Aug;22(4):368-75. doi: 10.1177/1553350614556367. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
8
Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome.机器人辅助低位直肠切除术:从更好的视野到更好的手术效果。
Singapore Med J. 2009 Aug;50(8):763-7.
9
Multimodality laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic malignancy--from conventional total laparoscopic approach to robot-assisted laparoscopic approach.多模态腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝恶性肿瘤——从传统全腹腔镜方法到机器人辅助腹腔镜方法。
Int J Surg. 2011;9(4):324-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
10
Comparison of clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery using a simplified access system with conventional laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease.简化入路系统单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠恶性肿瘤的临床效果比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;14(4):e171-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02825.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer surgical and oncological outcomes.比较机器人辅助与腹腔镜直肠癌切除术的手术及肿瘤学结局。
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 13;12:1628649. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1628649. eCollection 2025.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating functional recovery, complication risk, and oncologic quality.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:一项对评估功能恢复、并发症风险和肿瘤学质量的随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 6;19(1):457. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02628-3.
3
A Case of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Using the Senhance Digital Laparoscopy System for Rectal Cancer.
使用森海思数字腹腔镜系统行经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌1例
Surg Case Rep. 2025;11(1). doi: 10.70352/scrj.cr.24-0024. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
4
Feasibility of hybrid robotic rectal surgery.混合机器人直肠手术的可行性
Surg Today. 2025 Feb 8. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03001-5.
5
Comparative study of robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center experience.机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的比较研究:单中心经验
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 7;14:1507323. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1507323. eCollection 2024.
6
Influence of BMI on robotic rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体重指数对机器人直肠癌手术的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jan 3;19(1):38. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02211-2.
7
Case report: A clinical report of photodynamic neoadjuvant combined with fluorescent laparoscopic localization robotic surgery for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer combined with obstruction.病例报告:光动力新辅助联合荧光腹腔镜定位机器人手术治疗合并梗阻的晚期结直肠癌患者的临床报告。
Front Immunol. 2024 Sep 4;15:1403613. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1403613. eCollection 2024.
8
Low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in robotic mid-low rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study from a single-center.机器人辅助中低位直肠癌手术中肠系膜下动脉低位结扎:单中心的对比研究。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Aug 21;18(1):325. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02080-9.
9
Comparison of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, and open surgery for lateral lymph-node dissection for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术、机器人辅助腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的短期结局比较:网状 Meta 分析。
Updates Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):1151-1160. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01871-x. Epub 2024 May 15.
10
Robotic-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes from a Tertiary Referral Center.机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:来自三级转诊中心的临床和财务结果分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 20;13(6):1795. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061795.